Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the block tree

[Florian Fainelli]

On 12/27/2019 12:44 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/27/19 1:39 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 13:29:40 -0700 Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 12/27/19 1:27 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>> On 12/27/2019 11:55 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:  
>>>>>
>>>>> In commit
>>>>>
>>>>>   1a3d78cb6e20 ("ata: ahci_brcm: BCM7425 AHCI requires AHCI_HFLAG_DELAY_ENGINE")
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes tags
>>>>>
>>>>>   Fixes: 9586114cf1e9 ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add support MIPS-based platforms")
>>>>>   Fixes: 423be77daabe ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add quirk for broken ncq")
>>>>>
>>>>> have this problem:
>>>>>
>>>>>   - Target SHA1s do not exist
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps you meant
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 1980eb9bd7d7 ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add support for MIPS-based platforms")
>>>>> Fixes: 7de3244530bf ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: disable NCQ for MIPS-based platforms")  
>>>>
>>>> Yes, those are the two that should have been used, the two commits were
>>>> extracted from a downstream tree where the upstream commits ended up
>>>> looking slightly different, my script does not (yet) rewrite those, Jens
>>>> would you want me to resubmit or can you rewrite the commit message in
>>>> place?  
>>>
>>> It's too late unfortunately, Linus already pulled it. So we'll have to
>>> live with it, at least the commit titles are correct so it should be
>>> manageable.
>>
>> Unfortunately, even the titles are not correct, so they took me a
>> little time to find the correct commits :-(  This means it will also
>> take the stable maintainers a bit of time.
> 
> Yeah I see, the 2nd one is not. Gah, that really sucks. I'll let stable
> know.
> 
> Florian, please ensure that future submissions have both the right titles
> and shas.

Definitively, very sorry about that and thank you both.
-- 
Florian