[PATCH 4.14 011/161] btrfs: dont double lock the subvol_sem for rename exchange
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Sun Dec 29 2019 - 12:21:29 EST
From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 943eb3bf25f4a7b745dd799e031be276aa104d82 upstream.
If we're rename exchanging two subvols we'll try to lock this lock
twice, which is bad. Just lock once if either of the ino's are subvols.
Fixes: cdd1fedf8261 ("btrfs: add support for RENAME_EXCHANGE and RENAME_WHITEOUT")
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -9820,9 +9820,8 @@ static int btrfs_rename_exchange(struct
return -EXDEV;
/* close the race window with snapshot create/destroy ioctl */
- if (old_ino == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID)
- down_read(&fs_info->subvol_sem);
- if (new_ino == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID)
+ if (old_ino == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID ||
+ new_ino == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID)
down_read(&fs_info->subvol_sem);
/*
@@ -10014,9 +10013,8 @@ out_fail:
ret2 = btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
ret = ret ? ret : ret2;
out_notrans:
- if (new_ino == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID)
- up_read(&fs_info->subvol_sem);
- if (old_ino == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID)
+ if (new_ino == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID ||
+ old_ino == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID)
up_read(&fs_info->subvol_sem);
return ret;