[PATCH 4.19 087/219] drm/gma500: fix memory disclosures due to uninitialized bytes
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Sun Dec 29 2019 - 12:31:25 EST
From: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@xxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit ec3b7b6eb8c90b52f61adff11b6db7a8db34de19 ]
"clock" may be copied to "best_clock". Initializing best_clock
is not sufficient. The fix initializes clock as well to avoid
memory disclosures and informaiton leaks.
Signed-off-by: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191018044150.1899-1-kjlu@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c
index 1b7fd6a9d8a5..f73a02a2a5b3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/oaktrail_crtc.c
@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ static bool mrst_sdvo_find_best_pll(const struct gma_limit_t *limit,
s32 freq_error, min_error = 100000;
memset(best_clock, 0, sizeof(*best_clock));
+ memset(&clock, 0, sizeof(clock));
for (clock.m = limit->m.min; clock.m <= limit->m.max; clock.m++) {
for (clock.n = limit->n.min; clock.n <= limit->n.max;
@@ -195,6 +196,7 @@ static bool mrst_lvds_find_best_pll(const struct gma_limit_t *limit,
int err = target;
memset(best_clock, 0, sizeof(*best_clock));
+ memset(&clock, 0, sizeof(clock));
for (clock.m = limit->m.min; clock.m <= limit->m.max; clock.m++) {
for (clock.p1 = limit->p1.min; clock.p1 <= limit->p1.max;
--
2.20.1