Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add Gateworks Ventana i.MX6DL/Q compatibles

[Rob Herring]

On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 5:34 PM Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 8:26 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 05:00:16PM -0800, Robert Jones wrote:
> > > Add the compatible enum entries for Gateworks Ventana boards.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Robert Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 2 ++
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > index f79683a..a02e980 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ properties:
> > >                - toradex,apalis_imx6q-ixora      # Apalis iMX6 Module on Ixora
> > >                - toradex,apalis_imx6q-ixora-v1.1 # Apalis iMX6 Module on Ixora V1.1
> > >                - variscite,dt6customboard
> > > +              - gw,ventana                # Gateworks i.MX6DL or i.MX6Q Ventana
> >
> > Keep entries sorted.
>
> Just for clarification: shouldn't the entries inside fsl.yaml match
> the dtb file names?

No. They should match top-level compatibles. However, I'd expect a 1:1
relationship of dtbs to top-level compatible entries.

> In case of the i.MX6Q based gateworks board, this should be:
>
> gw,imx6q-gw51xx
> gw,imx6q-gw52xx
> gw,imx6q-gw53xx
> gw,imx6q-gw5400-a
> gw,imx6q-gw54xx
> gw,imx6q-gw551x
> gw,imx6q-gw552x
> gw,imx6q-gw553x
> gw,imx6q-gw560x
> gw,imx6q-gw5903
> gw,imx6q-gw5904
>
> Please advise.

Yes, if this is 11 different boards, then yes, I'd expect 11
permutations for the schema.

Rob