Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] fixes for atmel-hlcdc
From: Sam Ravnborg
Date: Thu Jan 02 2020 - 04:06:02 EST
How do de handle the two mfd related patches?
> I have few fixes for atmel-hlcdc driver in this series as well
> as two reverts.
> Revert "drm: atmel-hlcdc: enable sys_clk during initalization." is
> due to the fix in in patch 2/5.
> Thank you,
> Claudiu Beznea
> Changes in v3:
> - changes dev_err() message in patch 4/6
> - collect Acked-by tags
> Changes in v2:
> - introduce patch 3/6
> - use dev_err() inpatch 4/6
> - introduce patch 5/6 instead of reverting commit f6f7ad323461
> ("drm/atmel-hlcdc: allow selecting a higher pixel-clock than requested")
> Claudiu Beznea (5):
> drm: atmel-hlcdc: use double rate for pixel clock only if supported
> drm: atmel-hlcdc: enable clock before configuring timing engine
> mfd: atmel-hlcdc: add struct device member to struct
> mfd: atmel-hlcdc: return in case of error
Would it be OK to apply the to drm-misc-next, or shal they go in via
your mfd tree?