Re: [PATCH RFT v1 1/3] drm/panfrost: enable devfreq based the "operating-points-v2" property

[Robin Murphy]

On 07/01/2020 11:06 pm, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> Decouple the check to see whether we want to enable devfreq for the GPU
> from dev_pm_opp_set_regulators(). This is preparation work for adding
> back support for regulator control (which means we need to call
> dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() before dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(), which
> means having a check for "is devfreq enabled" that is not tied to
> dev_pm_opp_of_add_table() makes things easier).

Hmm, what about cases like the SCMI DVFS protocol where the OPPs are 
dynamically discovered rather than statically defined in DT?

Robin.

> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c | 9 ++++++---
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c
> index 413987038fbf..1471588763ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>   #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>   #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
>   #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
>   #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>   
>   #include "panfrost_device.h"
> @@ -79,10 +80,12 @@ int panfrost_devfreq_init(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
>   	struct devfreq *devfreq;
>   	struct thermal_cooling_device *cooling;
>   
> -	ret = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(dev);
> -	if (ret == -ENODEV) /* Optional, continue without devfreq */
> +	if (!device_property_present(dev, "operating-points-v2"))
> +		/* Optional, continue without devfreq */
>   		return 0;
> -	else if (ret)
> +
> +	ret = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(dev);
> +	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>   
>   	panfrost_devfreq_reset(pfdev);