Re: Fix built-in early-load Intel microcode alignment
From: Luis Chamberlain
Date: Mon Jan 13 2020 - 10:47:44 EST
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 03:00:53PM +0200, Jari Ruusu wrote:
> Intel Software Developer's Manual, volume 3, chapter 9.11.6 says:
> "Note that the microcode update must be aligned on a 16-byte
> boundary and the size of the microcode update must be 1-KByte
> granular"
>
> When early-load Intel microcode is loaded from initramfs,
> userspace tool 'iucode_tool' has already 16-byte aligned those
> microcode bits in that initramfs image. Image that was created
> something like this:
>
> iucode_tool --write-earlyfw=FOO.cpio microcode-files...
>
> However, when early-load Intel microcode is loaded from built-in
> firmware BLOB using CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE= kernel config option,
> that 16-byte alignment is not guaranteed.
Thanks for the patch!
So what happens with you use the built-in firmware loader for
the Intel microcode at this time? I am surprised this issue
wasn't reported earlier, so thanks for picking it up, but to
be complete such a change requires a bit more information.
What exactly happens now?
> Fix this by forcing all built-in firmware BLOBs to 16-byte
> alignment.
That's a huge stretch, see below.
> Signed-off-by: Jari Ruusu <jari.ruusu@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> --- a/drivers/base/firmware_loader/builtin/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_loader/builtin/Makefile
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
> filechk_fwbin = \
> echo "/* Generated by $(src)/Makefile */" ;\
> echo " .section .rodata" ;\
> - echo " .p2align $(ASM_ALIGN)" ;\
> + echo " .p2align 4" ;\
You are forcing 16 byte alignment to *all* built-in firmware, and some
architectures may have a different requirement. If things used to work
with ASM_ALIGN which is a construct only used for this code, but your
change fixes it with Intel microcode loading -- it however *may* break
things for other built-in firmware used. In particular if you note above
it used to align things to 2^3 so 8 bytes if on CONFIG_64BIT, otherwise
things get aligned to 2^2 so 4 bytes.
So I'd like to determine first if we really need this. Then if so,
either add a new global config option, and worst comes to worst
figure out a way to do it per driver. I don't think we'd need it
per driver.
If set as a global new config option, we can use the same logic and
allow an architecture override if the user / architecture kconfig
configures it such:
config ARCH_DEFAULT_FIRMWARE_ALIGNMENT
string "Default architecture firmware aligmnent"
"4" if 64BIT
"3" if !64BIT
config FIRMWARE_BUILTIN_ALIGN
string "Built in firmware aligment requirement"
default ARCH_DEFAULT_FIRMWARE_ALIGNMENT if !ARCH_CUSTOM_FIRMWARE_ALIGNMENT
default ARCH_CUSTOM_FIRMWARE_ALIGNMENT_VAL if ARCH_CUSTOM_FIRMWARE_ALIGNMENT
Some good description goes here
Or something like that.
Luis