Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Add YAML schemas for Intel Combo phy
From: Rob Herring
Date: Tue Jan 14 2020 - 09:31:23 EST
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 3:18 AM Dilip Kota <eswara.kota@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 1/8/2020 10:18 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 03:28:27PM +0800, Dilip Kota wrote:
> >> Combo phy subsystem provides PHY support to number of
> >> controllers, viz. PCIe, SATA and EMAC.
> >> Adding YAML schemas for the same.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dilip Kota <eswara.kota@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> .../devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,combo-phy.yaml | 147 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 147 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,combo-phy.yaml
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,combo-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,combo-phy.yaml
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..fc9cbad9dd88
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/intel,combo-phy.yaml
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
> >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> >> +%YAML 1.2
> >> +---
> >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/intel,combo-phy.yaml#
> >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >> +
> >> +title: Intel Combo phy Subsystem
> >> +
> >> +maintainers:
> >> + - Dilip Kota <eswara.kota@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> +
> >> +description: |
> >> + Intel combo phy subsystem supports PHYs for PCIe, EMAC and SATA
> >> + controllers. A single combo phy provides two PHY instances.
> >> +
> >> +properties:
> >> + $nodename:
> >> + pattern: "^combophy@[0-9]+$"
> >> +
> >> + compatible:
> >> + items:
> >> + - const: intel,combo-phy
> >> + - const: simple-bus
> > This will cause the schema to be applied to every 'simple-bus'. You need
> > a custom 'select' to prevent that. There's several examples in the tree.
>
> Ok, i will add as below:
>
> # We need a select here so we don't match all nodes with 'simple-bus'
> select:
> properties:
> compatible:
> contains:
> const: intel,combo-phy
> required:
> - compatible
>
> >
> > Though I'm not sure you need child nodes here.
> >
> >> +
> >> + cell-index:
> >> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> >> + description: Index of Combo phy hardware instance.
> > Drop this. Not used for FDT.
> Ok, I will remove this and use the 'aliases' to get the hardware instance.
> >
> >> +
> >> + resets:
> >> + maxItems: 2
> >> +
> >> + reset-names:
> >> + items:
> >> + - const: phy
> >> + - const: core
> >> +
> >> + intel,syscfg:
> >> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> >> + description: Chip configuration registers handle
> >> +
> >> + intel,hsio:
> >> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> >> + description: HSIO registers handle
> >> +
> >> + intel,bid:
> >> + description: Index of HSIO bus
> >> + allOf:
> >> + - $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> >> + - minimum: 0
> >> + - maximum: 1
> > If this is related to intel,hsio, just make it an args cell for
> > intel,hsio.
> No. Actually, this is specific to the combophy instance on the HSIO bus.
> I see , this can be removed and value can be derived from the hardware
> instance value mentioned through 'aliases'
Generally, 'aliases' should be optional. Why do you need an index?
What's the difference between the blocks?
If it wasn't clear, I was suggesting doing:
intel,hsio = <&hsio 1>;
Rob