Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] PCI: brcmstb: Add Broadcom STB PCIe host controller driver
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi
Date: Wed Jan 15 2020 - 05:01:05 EST
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 07:18:46PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> On Tue, 2020-01-14 at 17:11 +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:01:09PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > > From: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > This adds a basic driver for Broadcom's STB PCIe controller, for now
> > > aimed at Raspberry Pi 4's SoC, bcm2711.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Co-developed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@xxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@xxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@xxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@xxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes since v3:
> > > - Update commit message
> > > - rollback roundup_pow_two usage, it'll be updated later down the line
> > > - Remove comment in register definition
> > >
> > > Changes since v2:
> > > - Correct rc_bar2_offset sign
> >
> > In relation to this change.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > +static inline int brcm_pcie_get_rc_bar2_size_and_offset(struct brcm_pcie
> > > *pcie,
> > > + u64 *rc_bar2_size,
> > > + u64 *rc_bar2_offset)
> > > +{
> > > + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = pci_host_bridge_from_priv(pcie);
> > > + struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
> > > + struct resource_entry *entry;
> > > +
> > > + entry = resource_list_first_type(&bridge->dma_ranges, IORESOURCE_MEM);
> > > + if (!entry)
> > > + return -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > > + *rc_bar2_offset = -entry->offset;
> >
> > I think this deserves a comment - I guess it has to do with how the
> > controller expects CPU<->PCI offsets to be expressed compared to how it
> > is computed in dma_ranges entries.
>
> You're right, OF code calculates it by doing:
>
> offset = cpu_start_addr - pci_start_addr (see
> devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources())
>
> While the RC_BAR2_CONFIG register expects the opposite subtraction.
> I'll add a comment on the next revision.
There is no need for a new posting, either write that comment here
and I update the code or inline the patch or just resend *this* updated
patch to the list.
Thanks,
Lorenzo