[PATCH 3/7] t_next should increase position index
From: Vasily Averin
Date: Fri Jan 24 2020 - 02:03:30 EST
if seq_file .next fuction does not change position index,
read after some lseek can generate unexpected output.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 9bf1f2c..ca25210 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -3442,8 +3442,10 @@ static void *t_mod_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
loff_t l = *pos; /* t_probe_start() must use original pos */
void *ret;
- if (unlikely(ftrace_disabled))
+ if (unlikely(ftrace_disabled)) {
+ (*pos)++;
return NULL;
+ }
if (iter->flags & FTRACE_ITER_PROBE)
return t_probe_next(m, pos);
--
1.8.3.1