Re: [PATCH 0/7] seq_file .next functions should increase position index

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:02:36 +0300
Vasily Averin <vvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> I've sent patches into maillists of affected subsystems already,
> this patch-set fixes the problem in files related to 
> pstore, tracing, gcov, sysvipc  and other subsystems processed 
> via linux-kernel@ mailing list directly

Since you sent the patches out individually, and not as the usually way
of replying to the 0/7 patch (this email), do you expect the patches to
just be accepted by the individual maintainers, and not as a series?

-- Steve

> 
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283
> 
> Vasily Averin (7):
>   pstore_ftrace_seq_next should increase position index
>   gcov_seq_next should increase position index
>   t_next should increase position index
>   fpid_next should increase position index
>   eval_map_next should increase position index
>   trigger_next should increase position index
>   sysvipc_find_ipc should increase position index
> 
>  fs/pstore/inode.c                   | 2 +-
>  ipc/util.c                          | 2 +-
>  kernel/gcov/fs.c                    | 2 +-
>  kernel/trace/ftrace.c               | 9 ++++++---
>  kernel/trace/trace.c                | 4 +---
>  kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c | 5 +++--
>  6 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>