Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] compiler/gcc: Raise minimum GCC version for kernel builds to 4.8

[Michael Ellerman]

Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:26 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 10:36:37AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 7:34 AM Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > > It is very rare to see versions of GCC prior to 4.8 being used to build
>> > > the mainline kernel. These old compilers are also know to have codegen
>> > > issues which can lead to silent miscompilation:
>> > >
>> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145
>> > >
>> > > Raise the minimum GCC version for kernel build to 4.8 and remove some
>> > > tautological Kconfig dependencies as a consequence.
>> > >
>> > > Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > Thanks for the patch.
>> > Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > I wouldn't mind if this patch preceded the earlier one in the series
>> > adding the warning, should the series require a v2 and if folks are
>> > generally ok with bumping the min version.
>>
>> If I hadn't actually read your reply, I would have never spotted that
>> reviewed-by tag, hidden in a blob of text like that.
>>
>> Adding some whitespace before and after, such that it stands out a
>> little more, might avoid such issues.
>
> Ack. Do maintainers have tools for fetching patch series and
> automating collecting Reviewed-by tags, or is it all extremely manual?

Patchwork collects them for you. But not all maintainers use patchwork,
it's a bit new and trendy ;)

cheers