RE: [GIT PULL] x86/asm changes for v5.6

[Luck, Tony]

> In particular, I didn't check what the priority for the alternatives
> is. Since FSRM being set always implies ERMS being set too, it may be
> that the ERMS case is always picked with the above code.

Is there still some easy way to get gdb to disassemble from /dev/kmem
to see what we ended up with after all the patching?  With address space
randomization and other security bits I'm not certain what still works.

-Tony