Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm/mremap: use pmd_addr_end to calculate next in move_page_tables()

From: Dmitry Osipenko
Date: Tue Jan 28 2020 - 18:35:33 EST


29.01.2020 02:29, Wei Yang ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 06:59:48PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 28.01.2020 03:43, Wei Yang ÐÐÑÐÑ:
>>> On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 05:47:57PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> 18.01.2020 02:22, Wei Yang ÐÐÑÐÑ:
>>>>> Use the general helper instead of do it by hand.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> mm/mremap.c | 7 ++-----
>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/mm/mremap.c b/mm/mremap.c
>>>>> index c2af8ba4ba43..a258914f3ee1 100644
>>>>> --- a/mm/mremap.c
>>>>> +++ b/mm/mremap.c
>>>>> @@ -253,11 +253,8 @@ unsigned long move_page_tables(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>>>
>>>>> for (; old_addr < old_end; old_addr += extent, new_addr += extent) {
>>>>> cond_resched();
>>>>> - next = (old_addr + PMD_SIZE) & PMD_MASK;
>>>>> - /* even if next overflowed, extent below will be ok */
>>>>> + next = pmd_addr_end(old_addr, old_end);
>>>>> extent = next - old_addr;
>>>>> - if (extent > old_end - old_addr)
>>>>> - extent = old_end - old_addr;
>>>>> old_pmd = get_old_pmd(vma->vm_mm, old_addr);
>>>>> if (!old_pmd)
>>>>> continue;
>>>>> @@ -301,7 +298,7 @@ unsigned long move_page_tables(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>>>
>>>>> if (pte_alloc(new_vma->vm_mm, new_pmd))
>>>>> break;
>>>>> - next = (new_addr + PMD_SIZE) & PMD_MASK;
>>>>> + next = pmd_addr_end(new_addr, new_addr + len);
>>>>> if (extent > next - new_addr)
>>>>> extent = next - new_addr;
>>>>> move_ptes(vma, old_pmd, old_addr, old_addr + extent, new_vma,
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello Wei,
>>>>
>>>> Starting with next-20200122, I'm seeing the following in KMSG on NVIDIA
>>>> Tegra (ARM32):
>>>>
>>>> BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:(ptrval) type:MM_ANONPAGES val:190
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Would you mind letting me know which case you are testing?
>>
>> Nothing special, systemd starts to fall apart during boot.
>>
>>> Or the special thing is 32-bit platform?
>> I have a limited knowledge about mm/, so can't provide detailed explanation.
>>
>> Please take a look at this:
>>
>> [1]
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5/source/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-2level.h#L210
>>
>> [2]
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.5/source/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h#L549
>>
>> [3]
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c0ba10b512eb2e2a3888b6e6cc0e089f5e7a191b
>
> Thanks, I see the difference here.
>
> If this is the case, we can't use pmd_addr_end() to simplify the calculation.
> This changes the behavior.
>
> I would prepare another patch set to fix this. Would you mind helping me
> verify on your platform?

Sure, please feel free to CC me on that patch.