Re: [PATCH v2] dmaengine: Create symlinks between DMA channels and slaves

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Thu Jan 30 2020 - 05:47:34 EST


Hi Marek,

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:33 AM Marek Szyprowski
<m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 30.01.2020 09:30, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 6:47 PM Marek Szyprowski
> > <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On 17.01.2020 16:30, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>> Currently it is not easy to find out which DMA channels are in use, and
> >>> which slave devices are using which channels.
> >>>
> >>> Fix this by creating two symlinks between the DMA channel and the actual
> >>> slave device when a channel is requested:
> >>> 1. A "slave" symlink from DMA channel to slave device,
> >>> 2. A "dma:<name>" symlink slave device to DMA channel.
> >>> When the channel is released, the symlinks are removed again.
> >>> The latter requires keeping track of the slave device and the channel
> >>> name in the dma_chan structure.
> >>>
> >>> Note that this is limited to channel request functions for requesting an
> >>> exclusive slave channel that take a device pointer (dma_request_chan()
> >>> and dma_request_slave_channel*()).
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Tested-by: Niklas SÃderlund <niklas.soderlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> This patch breaks booting on almost all Exynos based boards:
> >>
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/20200129161113.GE3928@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
> > Sorry for the breakage.
>
> No problem, that's why we have linux-next.

Not really: by that time it had been upstream for 2 days :-(

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds