Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Add Tegra driver for video capture

[Thierry Reding]

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 03:41:50PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi Sowjanya,
> 
> On 1/28/20 7:23 PM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
> > This series adds Tegra210 VI and CSI driver for built-in test pattern
> > generator (TPG) capture.
> > 
> > Tegra210 supports max 6 channels on VI and 6 ports on CSI where each
> > CSI port is one-to-one mapped to VI channel for video capture.
> > 
> > This series has TPG support only where it creates hard media links
> > between CSI subdevice and VI video device without device graphs.
> > 
> > v4l2-compliance results are available below the patch diff.
> > 
> > [v0]:	Includes,
> > 	- Adds CSI TPG clock to Tegra210 clock driver
> > 	- Host1x video driver with VI and CSI clients.
> > 	- Support for Tegra210 only.
> > 	- VI CSI TPG support with hard media links in driver.
> > 	- Video formats supported by Tegra210 VI
> > 	- CSI TPG supported video formats
> 
> I'm trying to compile this patch series using the media_tree master
> branch (https://git.linuxtv.org//media_tree.git), but it fails:
> 
> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-channel.c: In function âtegra_channel_queue_setupâ:
> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-channel.c:71:15: warning: unused variable âcountâ [-Wunused-variable]
>    71 |  unsigned int count = *nbuffers;
>       |               ^~~~~
> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-channel.c: In function âtegra_channel_initâ:
> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-channel.c:518:55: error: âstruct host1x_clientâ has no member named âhostâ
>   518 |  struct tegra_camera *cam = dev_get_drvdata(vi->client.host);
>       |                                                       ^
> make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:265: drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-channel.o] Error 1
> make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-vi.c: In function âtegra_vi_tpg_graph_initâ:
> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-vi.c:157:55: error: âstruct host1x_clientâ has no member named âhostâ
>   157 |  struct tegra_camera *cam = dev_get_drvdata(vi->client.host);
>       |                                                       ^
> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-vi.c: In function âtegra_vi_initâ:
> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-csi.c: In function âtegra_csi_initâ:
> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-vi.c:213:51: error: âstruct host1x_clientâ has no member named âhostâ
>   213 |  struct tegra_camera *cam = dev_get_drvdata(client->host);
>       |                                                   ^~
> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-csi.c:259:51: error: âstruct host1x_clientâ has no member named âhostâ
>   259 |  struct tegra_camera *cam = dev_get_drvdata(client->host);
>       |                                                   ^~
> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-vi.c: In function âtegra_vi_exitâ:
> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-vi.c:246:51: error: âstruct host1x_clientâ has no member named âhostâ
>   246 |  struct tegra_camera *cam = dev_get_drvdata(client->host);
>       |                                                   ^~
> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-csi.c: In function âtegra_csi_exitâ:
> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-csi.c:286:51: error: âstruct host1x_clientâ has no member named âhostâ
>   286 |  struct tegra_camera *cam = dev_get_drvdata(client->host);
>       |                                                   ^~
> 
> And indeed, struct host1x_client as defined in include/linux/host1x.h doesn't
> have a 'host' field.
> 
> Does this series depend on another patch that's not yet in mainline?

Sowjanya's been working on top of linux-next, so, yes, this patch
depends on a change that's been merged into the DRM tree for v5.6-rc1.

Thierry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature