Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: VMX: Extend VMX's #AC handding

[Xiaoyao Li]

On 1/30/2020 11:18 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Jan 30, 2020, at 4:24 AM, Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > ïThere are two types of #AC can be generated in Intel CPUs:
> > 1. legacy alignment check #AC;
> > 2. split lock #AC;
> >
> > Legacy alignment check #AC can be injected to guest if guest has enabled
> > alignemnet check.
> >
> > When host enables split lock detection, i.e., split_lock_detect!=off,
> > guest will receive an unexpected #AC when there is a split_lock happens in
> > guest since KVM doesn't virtualize this feature to guest.
> >
> > Since the old guests lack split_lock #AC handler and may have split lock
> > buges. To make guest survive from split lock, applying the similar policy
> > as host's split lock detect configuration:
> > - host split lock detect is sld_warn:
> >    warning the split lock happened in guest, and disabling split lock
> >    detect around VM-enter;
> > - host split lock detect is sld_fatal:
> >    forwarding #AC to userspace. (Usually userspace dump the #AC
> >    exception and kill the guest).
>
> A correct userspace implementation should, with a modern guest kernel, forward the exception. Otherwise youâre introducing a DoS into the guest if the guest kernel is fine but guest userspace is buggy.

To prevent DoS in guest, the better solution is virtualizing and 
advertising this feature to guest, so guest can explicitly enable it by 
setting split_lock_detect=fatal, if it's a latest linux guest.

However, it's another topic, I'll send out the patches later.

> Whatâs the intended behavior here?
It's for old guests. Below I quote what Paolo said in
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/57f40083-9063-5d41-f06d-fa1ae4c78ec6@xxxxxxxxxx/

"So for an old guest, as soon as the guest kernel happens to do a split 
lock, it gets an unexpected #AC and crashes and burns.  And then, after 
much googling and gnashing of teeth, people proceed to disable split 
lock detection.

(Old guests are the common case: you're a cloud provider and your
customers run old stuff; it's a workstation and you want to play that
game that requires an old version of Windows; etc.).

To save them the googling and gnashing of teeth, I guess we can do a
pr_warn_ratelimited on the first split lock encountered by a guest.  (It
has to be ratelimited because userspace could create an arbitrary amount
of guests to spam the kernel logs).  But the end result is the same,
split lock detection is disabled by the user."