Re: [PATCH 2/2] intel_idle: Introduce 'states_off' module parameter
From: Artem Bityutskiy
Date: Fri Jan 31 2020 - 06:24:30 EST
On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 11:07 +0000, David Laight wrote:
> Unless you know exactly which cpu table is being used the
> only constraint a user can request is the latency.
Hi David,
in all my use-cases I always know what is the CPU I am dealing with and
what are the C-states. Simply because in my view they are always CPU-
dependent in terms of what they do and how are they named.
What you say sounds to me like you would want to disable some C-states
without knowing anything (or much) about the CPU you are dealing with
and the C-state names.
If so, could you please share examples of such use-cases?
Thanks!
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy