Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Add Tegra driver for video capture

[Thierry Reding]

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 06:37:10PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 1/31/20 6:03 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 03:29:52PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> On 1/30/20 4:42 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 03:41:50PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>>> Hi Sowjanya,
> >>>>
> >>>> On 1/28/20 7:23 PM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
> >>>>> This series adds Tegra210 VI and CSI driver for built-in test pattern
> >>>>> generator (TPG) capture.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tegra210 supports max 6 channels on VI and 6 ports on CSI where each
> >>>>> CSI port is one-to-one mapped to VI channel for video capture.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This series has TPG support only where it creates hard media links
> >>>>> between CSI subdevice and VI video device without device graphs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> v4l2-compliance results are available below the patch diff.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [v0]:	Includes,
> >>>>> 	- Adds CSI TPG clock to Tegra210 clock driver
> >>>>> 	- Host1x video driver with VI and CSI clients.
> >>>>> 	- Support for Tegra210 only.
> >>>>> 	- VI CSI TPG support with hard media links in driver.
> >>>>> 	- Video formats supported by Tegra210 VI
> >>>>> 	- CSI TPG supported video formats
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm trying to compile this patch series using the media_tree master
> >>>> branch (https://git.linuxtv.org//media_tree.git), but it fails:
> >>>>
> >>>> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-channel.c: In function âtegra_channel_queue_setupâ:
> >>>> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-channel.c:71:15: warning: unused variable âcountâ [-Wunused-variable]
> >>>>    71 |  unsigned int count = *nbuffers;
> >>>>       |               ^~~~~
> >>>> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-channel.c: In function âtegra_channel_initâ:
> >>>> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-channel.c:518:55: error: âstruct host1x_clientâ has no member named âhostâ
> >>>>   518 |  struct tegra_camera *cam = dev_get_drvdata(vi->client.host);
> >>>>       |                                                       ^
> >>>> make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:265: drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-channel.o] Error 1
> >>>> make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> >>>> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-vi.c: In function âtegra_vi_tpg_graph_initâ:
> >>>> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-vi.c:157:55: error: âstruct host1x_clientâ has no member named âhostâ
> >>>>   157 |  struct tegra_camera *cam = dev_get_drvdata(vi->client.host);
> >>>>       |                                                       ^
> >>>> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-vi.c: In function âtegra_vi_initâ:
> >>>> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-csi.c: In function âtegra_csi_initâ:
> >>>> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-vi.c:213:51: error: âstruct host1x_clientâ has no member named âhostâ
> >>>>   213 |  struct tegra_camera *cam = dev_get_drvdata(client->host);
> >>>>       |                                                   ^~
> >>>> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-csi.c:259:51: error: âstruct host1x_clientâ has no member named âhostâ
> >>>>   259 |  struct tegra_camera *cam = dev_get_drvdata(client->host);
> >>>>       |                                                   ^~
> >>>> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-vi.c: In function âtegra_vi_exitâ:
> >>>> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-vi.c:246:51: error: âstruct host1x_clientâ has no member named âhostâ
> >>>>   246 |  struct tegra_camera *cam = dev_get_drvdata(client->host);
> >>>>       |                                                   ^~
> >>>> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-csi.c: In function âtegra_csi_exitâ:
> >>>> drivers/staging/media/tegra/tegra-csi.c:286:51: error: âstruct host1x_clientâ has no member named âhostâ
> >>>>   286 |  struct tegra_camera *cam = dev_get_drvdata(client->host);
> >>>>       |                                                   ^~
> >>>>
> >>>> And indeed, struct host1x_client as defined in include/linux/host1x.h doesn't
> >>>> have a 'host' field.
> >>>>
> >>>> Does this series depend on another patch that's not yet in mainline?
> >>>
> >>> Sowjanya's been working on top of linux-next, so, yes, this patch
> >>> depends on a change that's been merged into the DRM tree for v5.6-rc1.
> >>>
> >>> Thierry
> >>>
> >>
> >> Is there a specific linux-next tag that works? I tried next-20200131 but that
> >> failed to boot. Same problem with the mainline repo since the host1x patches
> >> were merged yesterday. It compiles fine, but the boot just stops. Or am I
> >> missing some kernel config that is now important to have?
> > 
> > linux-next and mainline are currently regressing on Tegra210 (and some
> > Tegra124) boards. I just sent out a series that fixes the regression for
> > me:
> > 
> > 	http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/list/?series=156215
> > 
> > Please test if this works for you. If so, I'll send this to Dave as soon
> > as possible.
> 
> I'll try it on Tuesday as I don't have access to the Jetson TX1 until then. It
> looks promising since I think that the last message I saw was a PM message.

Great. My local testing on Jetson Nano confirms that this fixes boot on
top of linux-next and I've also run it through our internal test farm
with success. I'll push this to my drm/tegra/for-next branch, so it
should show up in linux-next on Monday.

Thierry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature