Re: [PATCH v2 14/27] nvdimm/ocxl: Add support for near storage commands

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 14:46:42 +1100
Alastair D'Silva <alastair@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Similar to the previous patch, this adds support for near storage commands.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/nvdimm/ocxl/scm.c          |  6 +++++
>  drivers/nvdimm/ocxl/scm_internal.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/nvdimm/ocxl/scm_internal.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 85 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/ocxl/scm.c b/drivers/nvdimm/ocxl/scm.c
> index 1e175f3c3cf2..6c16ca7fabfa 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/ocxl/scm.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/ocxl/scm.c
> @@ -310,12 +310,18 @@ static int scm_setup_command_metadata(struct scm_data *scm_data)
>  	int rc;
>  
>  	mutex_init(&scm_data->admin_command.lock);
> +	mutex_init(&scm_data->ns_command.lock);
>  
>  	rc = scm_extract_command_metadata(scm_data, GLOBAL_MMIO_ACMA_CREQO,
>  					  &scm_data->admin_command);
>  	if (rc)
>  		return rc;
>  
> +	rc = scm_extract_command_metadata(scm_data, GLOBAL_MMIO_NSCMA_CREQO,
> +					  &scm_data->ns_command);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return rc;
> +

Ah. So much for my comment in previous patch.  Ignore that...

>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/ocxl/scm_internal.c b/drivers/nvdimm/ocxl/scm_internal.c
> index 7b11b56863fb..c405f1d8afb8 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/ocxl/scm_internal.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/ocxl/scm_internal.c
> @@ -132,6 +132,47 @@ int scm_admin_response_handled(const struct scm_data *scm_data)
>  				      OCXL_LITTLE_ENDIAN, GLOBAL_MMIO_CHI_ACRA);
>  }
>  
> +int scm_ns_command_request(struct scm_data *scm_data, u8 op_code)
> +{
> +	u64 val;
> +	int rc = ocxl_global_mmio_read64(scm_data->ocxl_afu, GLOBAL_MMIO_CHI,
> +					 OCXL_LITTLE_ENDIAN, &val);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return rc;
> +
> +	if (!(val & GLOBAL_MMIO_CHI_NSCRA))
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +
> +	return scm_command_request(scm_data, &scm_data->ns_command, op_code);
> +}
> +
> +int scm_ns_response(const struct scm_data *scm_data)
> +{
> +	return scm_command_response(scm_data, &scm_data->ns_command);
> +}
> +
> +int scm_ns_command_execute(const struct scm_data *scm_data)
> +{
> +	return ocxl_global_mmio_set64(scm_data->ocxl_afu, GLOBAL_MMIO_HCI,
> +				      OCXL_LITTLE_ENDIAN, GLOBAL_MMIO_HCI_NSCRW);
> +}
> +
> +bool scm_ns_command_complete(const struct scm_data *scm_data)
> +{
> +	u64 val = 0;
> +	int rc = scm_chi(scm_data, &val);
> +
> +	WARN_ON(rc);
> +
> +	return (val & GLOBAL_MMIO_CHI_NSCRA) != 0;
> +}
> +
> +int scm_ns_response_handled(const struct scm_data *scm_data)
> +{
> +	return ocxl_global_mmio_set64(scm_data->ocxl_afu, GLOBAL_MMIO_CHIC,
> +				      OCXL_LITTLE_ENDIAN, GLOBAL_MMIO_CHI_NSCRA);
> +}
> +
>  void scm_warn_status(const struct scm_data *scm_data, const char *message,
>  		     u8 status)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/ocxl/scm_internal.h b/drivers/nvdimm/ocxl/scm_internal.h
> index 9bff684cd069..9575996a89e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/ocxl/scm_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/ocxl/scm_internal.h
> @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ struct scm_data {
>  	struct ocxl_context *ocxl_context;
>  	void *metadata_addr;
>  	struct command_metadata admin_command;
> +	struct command_metadata ns_command;
>  	struct resource scm_res;
>  	struct nd_region *nd_region;
>  	char fw_version[8+1];
> @@ -176,6 +177,42 @@ int scm_admin_command_complete_timeout(const struct scm_data *scm_data,
>   */
>  int scm_admin_response_handled(const struct scm_data *scm_data);
>  
> +/**
> + * scm_ns_command_request() - Issue a near storage command request
> + * @scm_data: a pointer to the SCM device data
> + * @op_code: The op-code for the command
> + * Returns an identifier for the command, or negative on error
> + */
> +int scm_ns_command_request(struct scm_data *scm_data, u8 op_code);
> +
> +/**
> + * scm_ns_response() - Validate a near storage response
> + * @scm_data: a pointer to the SCM device data
> + * Returns the status code of the command, or negative on error
> + */
> +int scm_ns_response(const struct scm_data *scm_data);
> +
> +/**
> + * scm_ns_command_execute() - Notify the controller to start processing a pending near storage command
> + * @scm_data: a pointer to the SCM device data
> + * Returns 0 on success, negative on error
> + */
> +int scm_ns_command_execute(const struct scm_data *scm_data);
> +
> +/**
> + * scm_ns_command_complete() - Is a near storage command executing
> + * scm_data: a pointer to the SCM device data
> + * Returns true if the previous admin command has completed
> + */
> +bool scm_ns_command_complete(const struct scm_data *scm_data);
> +
> +/**
> + * scm_ns_response_handled() - Notify the controller that the near storage response has been handled
> + * scm_data: a pointer to the SCM device data
> + * Returns 0 on success, negative on failure
> + */
> +int scm_ns_response_handled(const struct scm_data *scm_data);
> +
>  /**
>   * scm_warn_status() - Emit a kernel warning showing a command status.
>   * @scm_data: a pointer to the SCM device data
> @@ -184,3 +221,4 @@ int scm_admin_response_handled(const struct scm_data *scm_data);
>   */
>  void scm_warn_status(const struct scm_data *scm_data, const char *message,
>  		     u8 status);
> +
Stray blank line!

Now we are into the real nitpicks.  Not enough coffee.

Jonathan