Re: possible deadlock in pty_write

From: Heiner Kallweit
Date: Mon Feb 03 2020 - 17:16:38 EST

Next message: Johannes Weiner: "Re: [PATCH v2 21/28] mm: memcg/slab: use a single set of kmem_caches for all memory cgroups"
Previous message: Ross Zwisler: "Re: [PATCH v4] Add a "nosymfollow" mount option."
In reply to: syzbot: "possible deadlock in pty_write"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 03.02.2020 22:58, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following crash on:
>
> HEAD commit: ccaaaf6f Merge tag 'mpx-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org..
> git tree: upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11bc585ee00000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=879390c6b09ccf66
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=3118a33395397bb6b0ca
> compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=165bda4ee00000
> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=1646a85ee00000
>
> The bug was bisected to:
>
> commit 65b27995a4ab8fc51b4adc6b4dcdca20f7a595bb
> Author: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon Aug 12 21:52:19 2019 +0000
>
> net: phy: let phy_speed_down/up support speeds >1Gbps
>

I don't see how this change in libphy could contribute to the reported issue.
Most likely bisecting wasn't correct.

> bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=1764f735e00000
> final crash: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=14e4f735e00000
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=10e4f735e00000
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+3118a33395397bb6b0ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fixes: 65b27995a4ab ("net: phy: let phy_speed_down/up support speeds >1Gbps")
>
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 5.5.0-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> syz-executor465/10262 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffffffff89b9f960 (console_owner){-.-.}, at: console_trylock_spinning kernel/printk/printk.c:1724 [inline]
> ffffffff89b9f960 (console_owner){-.-.}, at: vprintk_emit+0x3fd/0x700 kernel/printk/printk.c:1995
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff88808d6b7940 (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: pty_write+0xff/0x200 drivers/tty/pty.c:120
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #2 (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-.-.}:
> __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
> _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x95/0xcd kernel/locking/spinlock.c:159
> tty_port_tty_get+0x24/0x100 drivers/tty/tty_port.c:287
> tty_port_default_wakeup+0x16/0x40 drivers/tty/tty_port.c:47
> tty_port_tty_wakeup+0x57/0x70 drivers/tty/tty_port.c:387
> uart_write_wakeup+0x46/0x70 drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:104
> serial8250_tx_chars+0x495/0xaf0 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:1760
> serial8250_handle_irq.part.0+0x261/0x2b0 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:1833
> serial8250_handle_irq drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:1819 [inline]
> serial8250_default_handle_irq+0xc0/0x150 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:1849
> serial8250_interrupt+0xf1/0x1a0 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c:126
> __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x15d/0x970 kernel/irq/handle.c:149
> handle_irq_event_percpu+0x74/0x160 kernel/irq/handle.c:189
> handle_irq_event+0xa7/0x134 kernel/irq/handle.c:206
> handle_edge_irq+0x25e/0x8d0 kernel/irq/chip.c:830
> generic_handle_irq_desc include/linux/irqdesc.h:156 [inline]
> do_IRQ+0xde/0x280 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:250
> ret_from_intr+0x0/0x36
> arch_local_irq_restore arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:752 [inline]
> __raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:160 [inline]
> _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x90/0xe0 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:191
> spin_unlock_irqrestore include/linux/spinlock.h:393 [inline]
> uart_write+0x3b6/0x6f0 drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:613
> process_output_block drivers/tty/n_tty.c:595 [inline]
> n_tty_write+0x40e/0x1080 drivers/tty/n_tty.c:2333
> do_tty_write drivers/tty/tty_io.c:962 [inline]
> tty_write+0x496/0x7f0 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1046
> redirected_tty_write+0xb2/0xc0 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1067
> __vfs_write+0x8a/0x110 fs/read_write.c:494
> vfs_write+0x268/0x5d0 fs/read_write.c:558
> ksys_write+0x14f/0x290 fs/read_write.c:611
> __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:623 [inline]
> __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:620 [inline]
> __x64_sys_write+0x73/0xb0 fs/read_write.c:620
> do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
>
> -> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}:
> __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
> _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x95/0xcd kernel/locking/spinlock.c:159
> serial8250_console_write+0x253/0x9a0 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c:3142
> univ8250_console_write+0x5f/0x70 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c:587
> call_console_drivers kernel/printk/printk.c:1791 [inline]
> console_unlock+0xb7a/0xf00 kernel/printk/printk.c:2473
> vprintk_emit+0x2a0/0x700 kernel/printk/printk.c:1996
> vprintk_default+0x28/0x30 kernel/printk/printk.c:2023
> vprintk_func+0x7e/0x189 kernel/printk/printk_safe.c:386
> printk+0xba/0xed kernel/printk/printk.c:2056
> register_console+0x745/0xb50 kernel/printk/printk.c:2798
> univ8250_console_init+0x3e/0x4b drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c:682
> console_init+0x461/0x67b kernel/printk/printk.c:2884
> start_kernel+0x653/0x8e2 init/main.c:713
> x86_64_start_reservations+0x29/0x2b arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:490
> x86_64_start_kernel+0x77/0x7b arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:471
> secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S:242
>
> -> #0 (console_owner){-.-.}:
> check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2475 [inline]
> check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2580 [inline]
> validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2970 [inline]
> __lock_acquire+0x2596/0x4a00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3954
> lock_acquire+0x190/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4484
> console_trylock_spinning kernel/printk/printk.c:1745 [inline]
> vprintk_emit+0x43a/0x700 kernel/printk/printk.c:1995
> vprintk_default+0x28/0x30 kernel/printk/printk.c:2023
> vprintk_func+0x7e/0x189 kernel/printk/printk_safe.c:386
> printk+0xba/0xed kernel/printk/printk.c:2056
> fail_dump lib/fault-inject.c:45 [inline]
> should_fail+0x708/0x852 lib/fault-inject.c:144
> __should_failslab+0x121/0x190 mm/failslab.c:33
> should_failslab+0x9/0x14 mm/slab_common.c:1811
> slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:567 [inline]
> slab_alloc mm/slab.c:3306 [inline]
> __do_kmalloc mm/slab.c:3654 [inline]
> __kmalloc+0x71/0x770 mm/slab.c:3665
> kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:561 [inline]
> tty_buffer_alloc drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:175 [inline]
> __tty_buffer_request_room+0x1fb/0x5c0 drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:273
> tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag+0x93/0x1f0 drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:318
> tty_insert_flip_string include/linux/tty_flip.h:37 [inline]
> pty_write+0x133/0x200 drivers/tty/pty.c:122
> n_tty_write+0xb1d/0x1080 drivers/tty/n_tty.c:2356
> do_tty_write drivers/tty/tty_io.c:962 [inline]
> tty_write+0x496/0x7f0 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1046
> do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:717 [inline]
> do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:701 [inline]
> do_iter_write fs/read_write.c:972 [inline]
> do_iter_write+0x4a0/0x610 fs/read_write.c:951
> vfs_writev+0x1b3/0x2f0 fs/read_write.c:1015
> do_writev+0x15b/0x330 fs/read_write.c:1058
> __do_sys_writev fs/read_write.c:1131 [inline]
> __se_sys_writev fs/read_write.c:1128 [inline]
> __x64_sys_writev+0x75/0xb0 fs/read_write.c:1128
> do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> Chain exists of:
> console_owner --> &port_lock_key --> &(&port->lock)->rlock
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(&(&port->lock)->rlock);
> lock(&port_lock_key);
> lock(&(&port->lock)->rlock);
> lock(console_owner);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> 5 locks held by syz-executor465/10262:
> #0: ffff88809dca8090 (&tty->ldisc_sem){++++}, at: ldsem_down_read+0x33/0x40 drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c:340
> #1: ffff88809dca8118 (&tty->atomic_write_lock){+.+.}, at: tty_write_lock+0x23/0x90 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:888
> #2: ffff88809dca82a0 (&tty->termios_rwsem){++++}, at: n_tty_write+0x1b5/0x1080 drivers/tty/n_tty.c:2316
> #3: ffffc90007a67360 (&ldata->output_lock){+.+.}, at: n_tty_write+0xadd/0x1080 drivers/tty/n_tty.c:2355
> #4: ffff88808d6b7940 (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: pty_write+0xff/0x200 drivers/tty/pty.c:120
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 PID: 10262 Comm: syz-executor465 Not tainted 5.5.0-syzkaller #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
> Call Trace:
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
> dump_stack+0x197/0x210 lib/dump_stack.c:118
> print_circular_bug.isra.0.cold+0x163/0x172 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1684
> check_noncircular+0x32e/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1808
> check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2475 [inline]
> check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2580 [inline]
> validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2970 [inline]
> __lock_acquire+0x2596/0x4a00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3954
> lock_acquire+0x190/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4484
> console_trylock_spinning kernel/printk/printk.c:1745 [inline]
> vprintk_emit+0x43a/0x700 kernel/printk/printk.c:1995
> vprintk_default+0x28/0x30 kernel/printk/printk.c:2023
> vprintk_func+0x7e/0x189 kernel/printk/printk_safe.c:386
> printk+0xba/0xed kernel/printk/printk.c:2056
> fail_dump lib/fault-inject.c:45 [inline]
> should_fail+0x708/0x852 lib/fault-inject.c:144
> __should_failslab+0x121/0x190 mm/failslab.c:33
> should_failslab+0x9/0x14 mm/slab_common.c:1811
> slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:567 [inline]
> slab_alloc mm/slab.c:3306 [inline]
> __do_kmalloc mm/slab.c:3654 [inline]
> __kmalloc+0x71/0x770 mm/slab.c:3665
> kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:561 [inline]
> tty_buffer_alloc drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:175 [inline]
> __tty_buffer_request_room+0x1fb/0x5c0 drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:273
> tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag+0x93/0x1f0 drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:318
> tty_insert_flip_string include/linux/tty_flip.h:37 [inline]
> pty_write+0x133/0x200 drivers/tty/pty.c:122
> n_tty_write+0xb1d/0x1080 drivers/tty/n_tty.c:2356
> do_tty_write drivers/tty/tty_io.c:962 [inline]
> tty_write+0x496/0x7f0 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1046
> do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:717 [inline]
> do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:701 [inline]
> do_iter_write fs/read_write.c:972 [inline]
> do_iter_write+0x4a0/0x610 fs/read_write.c:951
> vfs_writev+0x1b3/0x2f0 fs/read_write.c:1015
> do_writev+0x15b/0x330 fs/read_write.c:1058
> __do_sys_writev fs/read_write.c:1131 [inline]
> __se_sys_writev fs/read_write.c:1128 [inline]
> __x64_sys_writev+0x75/0xb0 fs/read_write.c:1128
> do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> RIP: 0033:0x4437c9
> Code: e8 0c e8 ff ff 48 83 c4 18 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 6b 09 fc ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
> RSP: 002b:00007ffe144fe178 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000014
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00000000004437c9
> RDX: 1000000000000252 RSI: 00000000200023c0 RDI: 0000000000000005
> RBP: 00000000000385a4 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000400033
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: ffffffffffffffff
> R13: 0000000000000006 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
>
>
> ---
> This bug is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
> syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> syzbot will keep track of this bug report. See:
> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
> For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection
> syzbot can test patches for this bug, for details see:
> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches
>

Next message: Johannes Weiner: "Re: [PATCH v2 21/28] mm: memcg/slab: use a single set of kmem_caches for all memory cgroups"
Previous message: Ross Zwisler: "Re: [PATCH v4] Add a "nosymfollow" mount option."
In reply to: syzbot: "possible deadlock in pty_write"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]