Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] remoteproc: Use u64 len for da_to_va

From: ClÃment Leger
Date: Tue Feb 04 2020 - 12:10:19 EST

Next message: Yu-cheng Yu: "[PATCH 0/2] Introduce Control-flow Enforcement opcodes"
Previous message: Kai-Heng Feng: "Re: [PATCH] PCI: Avoid ASMedia XHCI USB PME# from D0 defect"
In reply to: Arnaud POULIQUEN: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] remoteproc: Use u64 len for da_to_va"
Next in thread: Arnaud POULIQUEN: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] remoteproc: Use u64 len for da_to_va"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Arnaud,

My bad, I thought it was only V1.
I will resend it as a V3 with a cover letter.

----- On 4 Feb, 2020, at 17:27, Arnaud Pouliquen arnaud.pouliquen@xxxxxx wrote:

> Hi ClÃment,
>
> Is it v2 or V3?
> I also suggest you add a cover letter when you post more than one patch in a
> thread.
>
> On 2/4/20 3:33 PM, Clement Leger wrote:
>> With upcoming changes in elf loader for elf64 support, section size will
>> be a u64. When used with da_to_va, this will potentially lead to
>> overflow if using the current "int" type for len argument. Change
>> da_to_va prototype to use a u64 for len and fix all users of this
>> function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Clement Leger <cleger@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> V2:
>> - Change len type from int to u64
>>
>> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 5 +++--
>> drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 2 +-
>> drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/remoteproc/wkup_m3_rproc.c | 2 +-
>> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 2 +-
>> 12 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
>> index 3e72b6f38d4b..7ec79be5eb5d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
>> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_da_to_sys(struct imx_rproc *priv, u64
>> da,
>> return -ENOENT;
>> }
>>
>> -static void *imx_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len)
>> +static void *imx_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len)
> I wonder if you could use size_t instead?

I wondered too but size_t is a unsigned int on 32 bits system. So if they load
a elf64 binary (which might be in 32bits zone), the segment size will be
a u64 type.

> Does it make sense for 32-bit system to have a physical address space higher?
> it's an open question I won't pretend to have the answer...:)

I agree that it does not make a lot of sense... But when we discussed it in
OpenAMP WG, it was mentionned that this should be supported.

>
>
>> {
>> struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
>> void *va = NULL;
>> @@ -235,7 +235,8 @@ static void *imx_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da,
>> int len)
> len type to update

I missed this one and I will double check all other callers

Thanks,

ClÃment.

>
> Regards,
> Arnaud
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "da = 0x%llx len = 0x%x va = 0x%p\n", da, len, va);
>> + dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "da = 0x%llx len = 0x%llx va = 0x%p\n", da, len,
>> + va);
>>
>> return va;
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c
>> index 5c4658f00b3d..25c01df47eba 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/keystone_remoteproc.c
>> @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static void keystone_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int
>> vqid)
>> * can be used either by the remoteproc core for loading (when using kernel
>> * remoteproc loader), or by any rpmsg bus drivers.
>> */
>> -static void *keystone_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len)
>> +static void *keystone_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len)
>> {
>> struct keystone_rproc *ksproc = rproc->priv;
>> void __iomem *va = NULL;
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
>> index e953886b2eb7..7518e67a49e5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
>> @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static int adsp_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -static void *adsp_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len)
>> +static void *adsp_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len)
>> {
>> struct qcom_adsp *adsp = (struct qcom_adsp *)rproc->priv;
>> int offset;
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
>> index 471128a2e723..248febde6fc1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
>> @@ -1148,7 +1148,7 @@ static int q6v5_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void *q6v5_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len)
>> +static void *q6v5_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len)
>> {
>> struct q6v5 *qproc = rproc->priv;
>> int offset;
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
>> index db4b3c4bacd7..cf2cd609c90d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
>> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static int adsp_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -static void *adsp_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len)
>> +static void *adsp_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len)
>> {
>> struct qcom_adsp *adsp = (struct qcom_adsp *)rproc->priv;
>> int offset;
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c
>> index f93e1e4a1cc0..3a6b82a16961 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c
>> @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static int q6v5_wcss_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void *q6v5_wcss_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len)
>> +static void *q6v5_wcss_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len)
>> {
>> struct q6v5_wcss *wcss = rproc->priv;
>> int offset;
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
>> index dc135754bb9c..f893219e45a8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
>> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int wcnss_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -static void *wcnss_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len)
>> +static void *wcnss_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len)
>> {
>> struct qcom_wcnss *wcnss = (struct qcom_wcnss *)rproc->priv;
>> int offset;
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> index 307df98347ba..9e6d3c6a60ee 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_va_to_pa);
>> * here the output of the DMA API for the carveouts, which should be more
>> * correct.
>> */
>> -void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len)
>> +void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len)
>> {
>> struct rproc_mem_entry *carveout;
>> void *ptr = NULL;
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>> index 493ef9262411..004867061721 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
>> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ void rproc_exit_sysfs(void);
>> void rproc_free_vring(struct rproc_vring *rvring);
>> int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i);
>>
>> -void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len);
>> +void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len);
>> phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr);
>> int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c
>> index 04492fead3c8..2fd14afb3157 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_slim_rproc.c
>> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static int slim_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void *slim_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len)
>> +static void *slim_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len)
>> {
>> struct st_slim_rproc *slim_rproc = rproc->priv;
>> void *va = NULL;
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/wkup_m3_rproc.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/wkup_m3_rproc.c
>> index 3984e585c847..0e8082948489 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/wkup_m3_rproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/wkup_m3_rproc.c
>> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static int wkup_m3_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void *wkup_m3_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len)
>> +static void *wkup_m3_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len)
>> {
>> struct wkup_m3_rproc *wkupm3 = rproc->priv;
>> void *va = NULL;
>> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>> index 16ad66683ad0..f84bd5fe0211 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
>> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ struct rproc_ops {
>> int (*start)(struct rproc *rproc);
>> int (*stop)(struct rproc *rproc);
>> void (*kick)(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
>> - void * (*da_to_va)(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len);
>> + void * (*da_to_va)(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, u64 len);
>> int (*parse_fw)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
>> int (*handle_rsc)(struct rproc *rproc, u32 rsc_type, void *rsc,
>> int offset, int avail);

Next message: Yu-cheng Yu: "[PATCH 0/2] Introduce Control-flow Enforcement opcodes"
Previous message: Kai-Heng Feng: "Re: [PATCH] PCI: Avoid ASMedia XHCI USB PME# from D0 defect"
In reply to: Arnaud POULIQUEN: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] remoteproc: Use u64 len for da_to_va"
Next in thread: Arnaud POULIQUEN: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] remoteproc: Use u64 len for da_to_va"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]