Re: [PATCH 1/3] epoll: fix possible lost wakeup on epoll_ctl() path

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 18:20:03 +0100, Roman Penyaev wrote:
> On 2020-02-04 17:32, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 11:41:42 +0100, Roman Penyaev wrote:  
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >> 
> >> Could you please suggest me, do I need to include Reported-by tag,
> >> or reference to the bug is enough?  
> > 
> > Sorry to jump in but FWIW I like the Reported-and-bisected-by tag to
> > fully credit the extra work done by the reporter.  
> 
> Reported-by: Max Neunhoeffer <max@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Bisected-by: Max Neunhoeffer <max@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Correct?

That should work, I like the brevity of the single combined

Reported-and-bisected-by: Max Neunhoeffer <max@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

line but looks like some separate the two even when both point 
to the same person. 

Unfortunately Documentation/process is silent on any "bisected-by" 
use, so you'll have to exercise your own judgement :)