Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Don't try to map on error faults
From: Alyssa Rosenzweig
Date: Wed Feb 05 2020 - 07:24:30 EST
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Although it might be nice to
#define TRANSLATION_FAULT_LEVEL1 0xC1
...
#define TRANSLATION_FAULT_LEVEL4 0xC4
and then use semantic names instead of magic values. Minimally maybe add
a comment explaining that.
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 11:07:16AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> If the exception type isn't one of the normal faults, don't try to map
> and instead go straight to a terminal fault.
>
> Otherwise, we can get flooded by kernel warnings and further faults.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c
> index 763cfca886a7..80abddb4544c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c
> @@ -596,8 +596,9 @@ static irqreturn_t panfrost_mmu_irq_handler_thread(int irq, void *data)
> source_id = (fault_status >> 16);
>
> /* Page fault only */
> - if ((status & mask) == BIT(i)) {
> - WARN_ON(exception_type < 0xC1 || exception_type > 0xC4);
> + if ((status & mask) == BIT(i) &&
> + exception_type >= 0xC1 &&
> + exception_type <= 0xC4) {
>
> ret = panfrost_mmu_map_fault_addr(pfdev, i, addr);
> if (!ret) {
> --
> 2.21.0
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature