Re: [PATCH v2 10/17] iio: cros_ec: Use cros_ec_cmd()

[Enric Balletbo i Serra]

Hi Prashant,

On 6/2/20 13:17, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed,  5 Feb 2020 11:00:13 -0800
> Prashant Malani <pmalani@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Replace cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() with cros_ec_cmd()
>> which does the message buffer setup and cleanup.
>>
>> For one other usage, replace the cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() call with a
>> call to cros_ec_cmd_xfer(), in preparation for the removal of the former
>> function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Updated to use new function name and parameter list.
>> - Used C99 element setting to initialize param struct.
>> - For second usage, replaced cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() with
>>   cros_ec_cmd_xfer() which is functionally similar.
>>
>>  .../cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c    | 25 +++++++------------
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
>> index d3a3626c7cd834..94e22e7d927631 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
>> @@ -30,24 +30,15 @@ static int cros_ec_get_host_cmd_version_mask(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
>>  					     u16 cmd_offset, u16 cmd, u32 *mask)
>>  {
>>  	int ret;
>> -	struct {
>> -		struct cros_ec_command msg;
>> -		union {
>> -			struct ec_params_get_cmd_versions params;
>> -			struct ec_response_get_cmd_versions resp;
>> -		};
>> -	} __packed buf = {
>> -		.msg = {
>> -			.command = EC_CMD_GET_CMD_VERSIONS + cmd_offset,
>> -			.insize = sizeof(struct ec_response_get_cmd_versions),
>> -			.outsize = sizeof(struct ec_params_get_cmd_versions)
>> -			},
>> -		.params = {.cmd = cmd}
>> +	struct ec_params_get_cmd_versions params = {
>> +		.cmd = cmd,
>>  	};
>> +	struct ec_response_get_cmd_versions resp = {0};
>>  
>> -	ret = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(ec_dev, &buf.msg);
>> +	ret = cros_ec_cmd(ec_dev, 0, EC_CMD_GET_CMD_VERSIONS + cmd_offset,
>> +			  &params, sizeof(params), &resp, sizeof(resp), NULL);
>>  	if (ret >= 0)
>> -		*mask = buf.resp.version_mask;
>> +		*mask = resp.version_mask;
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -171,9 +162,11 @@ int cros_ec_motion_send_host_cmd(struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state *state,
>>  
>>  	memcpy(state->msg->data, &state->param, sizeof(state->param));
>>  
>> -	ret = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(state->ec, state->msg);
>> +	ret = cros_ec_cmd_xfer(state->ec, state->msg);
>>  	if (ret < 0)
>>  		return ret;
>> +	else if (state->msg->result != EC_RES_SUCCESS)
>> +		return -EPROTO;
>>  

There is no way to use the new cros_ec_cmd here?


>>  	if (ret &&
>>  	    state->resp != (struct ec_response_motion_sense *)state->msg->data)
>