Re: [PATCH 04/61] KVM: x86: Clean up error handling in kvm_dev_ioctl_get_cpuid()
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov
Date: Thu Feb 06 2020 - 10:10:00 EST
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Clean up the error handling in kvm_dev_ioctl_get_cpuid(), which has
> gotten a bit crusty as the function has evolved over the years.
>
> Opportunistically hoist the static @funcs declaration to the top of the
> function to make it more obvious that it's a "static const".
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 19 +++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index de52cbb46171..11d5f311ef10 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -889,45 +889,40 @@ int kvm_dev_ioctl_get_cpuid(struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid,
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 __user *entries,
> unsigned int type)
> {
> - struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *cpuid_entries;
> - int nent = 0, r = -E2BIG, i;
> -
> static const u32 funcs[] = {
> 0, 0x80000000, CENTAUR_CPUID_SIGNATURE, KVM_CPUID_SIGNATURE,
> };
>
> + struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *cpuid_entries;
> + int nent = 0, r, i;
> +
> if (cpuid->nent < 1)
> - goto out;
> + return -E2BIG;
> if (cpuid->nent > KVM_MAX_CPUID_ENTRIES)
> cpuid->nent = KVM_MAX_CPUID_ENTRIES;
>
> if (sanity_check_entries(entries, cpuid->nent, type))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - r = -ENOMEM;
> cpuid_entries = vzalloc(array_size(sizeof(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2),
> cpuid->nent));
> if (!cpuid_entries)
> - goto out;
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> - r = 0;
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(funcs); i++) {
> r = get_cpuid_func(cpuid_entries, funcs[i], &nent, cpuid->nent,
> type);
> if (r)
> goto out_free;
> }
> + cpuid->nent = nent;
>
> - r = -EFAULT;
> if (copy_to_user(entries, cpuid_entries,
> nent * sizeof(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2)))
> - goto out_free;
> - cpuid->nent = nent;
> - r = 0;
> + r = -EFAULT;
>
> out_free:
> vfree(cpuid_entries);
> -out:
> return r;
> }
Please [partially] disregard my comment on PATCH 02
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Vitaly