Re: [PATCH 5.5 00/23] 5.5.2-stable review

[Daniel DÃaz]

Hello!

On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 at 07:07, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 09:15:44PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 22:08, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.5.2 release.
> > > There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 05 Feb 2020 16:17:59 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.5.2-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.5.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > Results from Linaroâs test farm.
> > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
>
> Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.
>
> It would be interesting to figure out how all of the different build
> errors on this "round" of releases did not trip up your systems...

We're not building these configs:
  allyesconfig allmodconfig omap2plus_defconfig imx_v6_v7_defconfig
nor building for ARCH=riscv, which were the ones failing.

Greetings!

Daniel DÃaz
daniel.diaz@xxxxxxxxxx