Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Add dts for mt8183 GPU (and misc panfrost patches)

From: Nicolas Boichat
Date: Sun Feb 09 2020 - 22:40:08 EST

Next message: Boqun Feng: "[PATCH v3 0/3] PCI: hv: Generify pci-hyperv.c"
Previous message: Baoquan He: "Re: [PATCH 2/7] mm/sparse.c: Introduce a new function clear_subsection_map()"
Next in thread: Tomeu Vizoso: "Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Add dts for mt8183 GPU (and misc panfrost patches)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 4:13 PM Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2/7/20 8:42 AM, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 2:18 PM Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Some more changes are still required to get devfreq working, and of course
> >>> I do not have a userspace driver to test this with.
> >>
> >> Have you tried the Panfrost tests in IGT? They are atm quite basic, but
> >> could be interesting to check that the different HW units are correctly
> >> powered on.
> >
> > I haven't, you mean this right?
> > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/tomeu/igt-gpu-tools/tree/panfrost
>
> Yes, though may be better to use the upstream repo:
>
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools
>
> > Any specific test you have in mind?
>
> All the panfrost ones, but looks like panfrost_prime:gem-prime-import is
> failing atm:
>
> https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/2214987

(I first removed opp table from device tree to avoid constant spew
about devfreq not supporting 2 regulators, I should get around to fix
that...)

# /usr/libexec/igt-gpu-tools/panfrost_gem_new
IGT-Version: 1.24-gd4d574a4 (arm) (Linux: 4.19.99 aarch64)
Starting subtest: gem-new-4096
Subtest gem-new-4096: SUCCESS (0.000s)
Starting subtest: gem-new-0
Subtest gem-new-0: SUCCESS (0.000s)
Starting subtest: gem-new-zeroed
Subtest gem-new-zeroed: SUCCESS (0.001s)
# /usr/libexec/igt-gpu-tools/panfrost_get_param
IGT-Version: 1.24-gd4d574a4 (arm) (Linux: 4.19.99 aarch64)
Starting subtest: base-params
Subtest base-params: SUCCESS (0.000s)
Starting subtest: get-bad-param
Subtest get-bad-param: SUCCESS (0.000s)
Starting subtest: get-bad-padding
Subtest get-bad-padding: SUCCESS (0.000s)
# /usr/libexec/igt-gpu-tools/panfrost_prime
IGT-Version: 1.24-gd4d574a4 (arm) (Linux: 4.19.99 aarch64)
Starting subtest: gem-prime-import
(panfrost_prime:1527) ioctl_wrappers-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure
function prime_fd_to_handle, file
../igt-gpu-tools-9999/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c:1336:
(panfrost_prime:1527) ioctl_wrappers-CRITICAL: Failed assertion:
igt_ioctl((fd), ((((2U|1U) << (((0+8)+8)+14)) | ((('d')) << (0+8)) |
(((0x2e)) << 0) | ((((sizeof(struct drm_prime_handle)))) <<
((0+8)+8)))), (&args)) == 0
(panfrost_prime:1527) ioctl_wrappers-CRITICAL: Last errno: 95,
Operation not supported
(panfrost_prime:1527) ioctl_wrappers-CRITICAL: error: -1 != 0
Stack trace:
Subtest gem-prime-import failed.
Subtest gem-prime-import: FAIL (0.004s)
(but that looks expected?)

Now the trickier ones, I guess we're either missing something, or my
dirty 4.19 backport is very broken:
# /usr/libexec/igt-gpu-tools/panfrost_submit
IGT-Version: 1.24-gd4d574a4 (arm) (Linux: 4.19.99 aarch64)
Starting subtest: pan-submit
(panfrost_submit:1643) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function
__real_main86, file ../igt-gpu-tools-9999/tests/panfrost_submit.c:103:
(panfrost_submit:1643) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: syncobj_wait(fd,
&submit->args->out_sync, 1, abs_timeout(SHORT_TIME_NSEC), 0, NULL)
Stack trace:
Subtest pan-submit failed.
**** DEBUG ****
(panfrost_submit:1643) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function
__real_main86, file ../igt-gpu-tools-9999/tests/panfrost_submit.c:103:
(panfrost_submit:1643) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: syncobj_wait(fd,
&submit->args->out_sync, 1, abs_timeout(SHORT_TIME_NSEC), 0, NULL)
(panfrost_submit:1643) igt_core-INFO: Stack trace:
**** END ****
Subtest pan-submit: FAIL (0.119s)
Starting subtest: pan-submit-error-no-jc
Subtest pan-submit-error-no-jc: SUCCESS (0.000s)
Starting subtest: pan-submit-error-bad-in-syncs
Subtest pan-submit-error-bad-in-syncs: SUCCESS (0.012s)
Starting subtest: pan-submit-error-bad-bo-handles
Subtest pan-submit-error-bad-bo-handles: SUCCESS (0.012s)
Starting subtest: pan-submit-error-bad-requirements
Subtest pan-submit-error-bad-requirements: SUCCESS (0.012s)
Starting subtest: pan-submit-error-bad-out-sync
Subtest pan-submit-error-bad-out-sync: SUCCESS (0.012s)
Starting subtest: pan-reset
(panfrost_submit:1643) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function
__real_main86, file ../igt-gpu-tools-9999/tests/panfrost_submit.c:173:
(panfrost_submit:1643) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: syncobj_wait(fd,
&submit->args->out_sync, 1, abs_timeout(BAD_JOB_TIME_NSEC), 0, NULL)
Stack trace:
Subtest pan-reset failed.
**** DEBUG ****
(panfrost_submit:1643) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function
__real_main86, file ../igt-gpu-tools-9999/tests/panfrost_submit.c:173:
(panfrost_submit:1643) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: syncobj_wait(fd,
&submit->args->out_sync, 1, abs_timeout(BAD_JOB_TIME_NSEC), 0, NULL)
(panfrost_submit:1643) igt_core-INFO: Stack trace:
**** END ****
Subtest pan-reset: FAIL (0.840s)

The pan-submit case causes an MMU fault:
(full log: https://gist.github.com/drinkcat/1ae36cb1b1b71f30cc4fc29759612d76)

[ 1215.234937] [IGT] panfrost_submit: executing
[ 1215.318446] [IGT] panfrost_submit: starting subtest pan-submit
...
[ 1215.338644] panfrost 13040000.gpu: Unhandled Page fault in AS0 at
VA 0x000000FF00000000
Reason: TODO
raw fault status: 0xA002C0
decoded fault status: SLAVE FAULT
exception type 0xC0: UNKNOWN
access type 0x2: READ
source id 0xA0
[ 1215.444504] [IGT] panfrost_submit: exiting, ret=98
...
[ 1215.446902] panfrost 13040000.gpu: js fault, js=0,
status=JOB_BUS_FAULT, head=0x300b000, tail=0x300b000
[ 1215.446935] panfrost 13040000.gpu: Unhandled Page fault in AS0 at
VA 0x000000FF00000000
Reason: TODO
raw fault status: 0xA002C0
decoded fault status: SLAVE FAULT
exception type 0xC0: UNKNOWN
access type 0x2: READ
source id 0xA0

pan-reset failure looks similar:
https://gist.github.com/drinkcat/2d336d57e6b95262d83e7a28a409bc5b

Thanks,

> Cheers,
>
> Tomeu
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Tomeu
> >>
> >>> I believe at least patches 1, 2, and 3 can be merged. 4 and 5 are mostly
> >>> useful in conjunction with 6 and 7 (which are not ready yet), so I'll let
> >>> maintainers decide.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> Nicolas Boichat (7):
> >>> dt-bindings: gpu: mali-bifrost: Add Mediatek MT8183
> >>> arm64: dts: mt8183: Add node for the Mali GPU
> >>> drm/panfrost: Improve error reporting in panfrost_gpu_power_on
> >>> drm/panfrost: Add support for multiple regulators
> >>> drm/panfrost: Add support for multiple power domains
> >>> RFC: drm/panfrost: Add mt8183-mali compatible string
> >>> RFC: drm/panfrost: devfreq: Add support for 2 regulators
> >>>
> >>> .../bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml | 25 ++++
> >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-evb.dts | 7 +
> >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183.dtsi | 105 +++++++++++++++
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_devfreq.c | 17 +++
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c | 123 +++++++++++++++---
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.h | 27 +++-
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c | 41 ++++--
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gpu.c | 11 +-
> >>> 8 files changed, 326 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >>>

Next message: Boqun Feng: "[PATCH v3 0/3] PCI: hv: Generify pci-hyperv.c"
Previous message: Baoquan He: "Re: [PATCH 2/7] mm/sparse.c: Introduce a new function clear_subsection_map()"
Next in thread: Tomeu Vizoso: "Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Add dts for mt8183 GPU (and misc panfrost patches)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]