Re: [PATCH 1/3] epoll: fix possible lost wakeup on epoll_ctl() path

[Max Neunhöffer]

Dear Andrew and all,
Sorry, I did not understand that I should explicitly give consent.
This is fine with me.
Cheers
  Max

Am 10. Februar 2020 06:59:16 MEZ schrieb Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 18:20:03 +0100 Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@xxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>
>> On 2020-02-04 17:32, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> > On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 11:41:42 +0100, Roman Penyaev wrote:
>> >> Hi Andrew,
>> >> 
>> >> Could you please suggest me, do I need to include Reported-by tag,
>> >> or reference to the bug is enough?
>> > 
>> > Sorry to jump in but FWIW I like the Reported-and-bisected-by tag
>to
>> > fully credit the extra work done by the reporter.
>> 
>> Reported-by: Max Neunhoeffer <max@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Bisected-by: Max Neunhoeffer <max@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Correct?
>
>We could do that, but preferably with Max's approval (please?).
>
>Because people sometimes have issues with having their personal info
>added to the kernel commit record without having being asked.