we should be able to use dai->id to make that decision.
Why are we adding exactly duplicate function of q6afe_mi2s_set_sysclk here?
It isn't an exact duplicate.
The reason I split off the new function is because the clock IDs for PCM
overlap/duplicate the clock IDs for TDM, yet the parameters to
q6afe_port_set_sysclk are not the same for PCM and TDM.
 + SND_SOC_DAPM_AIF_IN("QUAT_PCM_RX", NULL,
+ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ 0, 0, 0, 0),