Re: [PATCH 46/62] x86/sev-es: Handle INVD Events

From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Tue Feb 11 2020 - 19:12:32 EST

Next message: Hilda Hancock: "Greetings From Mrs. Hilda Kickett Hancock."
Previous message: Daniel Borkmann: "Re: BPF LSM and fexit [was: [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/10] bpf: lsm: Add mutable hooks list for the BPF LSM]"
In reply to: Joerg Roedel: "[PATCH 46/62] x86/sev-es: Handle INVD Events"
Next in thread: Joerg Roedel: "Re: [PATCH 46/62] x86/sev-es: Handle INVD Events"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> On Feb 11, 2020, at 5:53 AM, Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ïFrom: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
>
> Implement a handler for #VC exceptions caused by INVD instructions.

Uh, what? Surely the #VC code can have a catch-all OOPS path for things like this. Linux should never ever do INVD.

Next message: Hilda Hancock: "Greetings From Mrs. Hilda Kickett Hancock."
Previous message: Daniel Borkmann: "Re: BPF LSM and fexit [was: [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/10] bpf: lsm: Add mutable hooks list for the BPF LSM]"
In reply to: Joerg Roedel: "[PATCH 46/62] x86/sev-es: Handle INVD Events"
Next in thread: Joerg Roedel: "Re: [PATCH 46/62] x86/sev-es: Handle INVD Events"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]