[PATCH 4.14 120/173] Btrfs: fix assertion failure on fsync with NO_HOLES enabled
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Thu Feb 13 2020 - 10:55:09 EST
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 0ccc3876e4b2a1559a4dbe3126dda4459d38a83b ]
Back in commit a89ca6f24ffe4 ("Btrfs: fix fsync after truncate when
no_holes feature is enabled") I added an assertion that is triggered when
an inline extent is found to assert that the length of the (uncompressed)
data the extent represents is the same as the i_size of the inode, since
that is true most of the time I couldn't find or didn't remembered about
any exception at that time. Later on the assertion was expanded twice to
deal with a case of a compressed inline extent representing a range that
matches the sector size followed by an expanding truncate, and another
case where fallocate can update the i_size of the inode without adding
or updating existing extents (if the fallocate range falls entirely within
the first block of the file). These two expansion/fixes of the assertion
were done by commit 7ed586d0a8241 ("Btrfs: fix assertion on fsync of
regular file when using no-holes feature") and commit 6399fb5a0b69a
("Btrfs: fix assertion failure during fsync in no-holes mode").
These however missed the case where an falloc expands the i_size of an
inode to exactly the sector size and inline extent exists, for example:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f -O no-holes /dev/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 1096" /mnt/foobar
wrote 1096/1096 bytes at offset 0
1 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0002 sec (4.448 MiB/sec and 4255.3191 ops/sec)
$ xfs_io -c "falloc 1096 3000" /mnt/foobar
$ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/foobar
Segmentation fault
$ dmesg
[701253.602385] assertion failed: len == i_size || (len == fs_info->sectorsize && btrfs_file_extent_compression(leaf, extent) != BTRFS_COMPRESS_NONE) || (len < i_size && i_size < fs_info->sectorsize), file: fs/btrfs/tree-log.c, line: 4727
[701253.602962] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[701253.603224] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3533!
[701253.603503] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI
[701253.603774] CPU: 2 PID: 7192 Comm: xfs_io Tainted: G W 5.0.0-rc8-btrfs-next-45 #1
[701253.604054] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626ccb91-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[701253.604650] RIP: 0010:assfail.constprop.23+0x18/0x1a [btrfs]
(...)
[701253.605591] RSP: 0018:ffffbb48c186bc48 EFLAGS: 00010286
[701253.605914] RAX: 00000000000000de RBX: ffff921d0a7afc08 RCX: 0000000000000000
[701253.606244] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff921d36b16868 RDI: ffff921d36b16868
[701253.606580] RBP: ffffbb48c186bcf0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[701253.606913] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff921d05d2de18
[701253.607247] R13: ffff921d03b54000 R14: 0000000000000448 R15: ffff921d059ecf80
[701253.607769] FS: 00007f14da906700(0000) GS:ffff921d36b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[701253.608163] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[701253.608516] CR2: 000056087ea9f278 CR3: 00000002268e8001 CR4: 00000000003606e0
[701253.608880] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[701253.609250] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[701253.609608] Call Trace:
[701253.609994] btrfs_log_inode+0xdfb/0xe40 [btrfs]
[701253.610383] btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x2be/0xa60 [btrfs]
[701253.610770] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0
[701253.611150] btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x4a/0x70 [btrfs]
[701253.611537] btrfs_sync_file+0x3b2/0x440 [btrfs]
[701253.612010] ? do_sysinfo+0xb0/0xf0
[701253.612552] do_fsync+0x38/0x60
[701253.612988] __x64_sys_fsync+0x10/0x20
[701253.613360] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1b0
[701253.613733] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[701253.614103] RIP: 0033:0x7f14da4e66d0
(...)
[701253.615250] RSP: 002b:00007fffa670fdb8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a
[701253.615647] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f14da4e66d0
[701253.616047] RDX: 000056087ea9c260 RSI: 000056087ea9c260 RDI: 0000000000000003
[701253.616450] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000020 R09: 0000000000000010
[701253.616854] R10: 000000000000009b R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000056087ea9c260
[701253.617257] R13: 000056087ea9c240 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 000056087ea9dd10
(...)
[701253.619941] ---[ end trace e088d74f132b6da5 ]---
Updating the assertion again to allow for this particular case would result
in a meaningless assertion, plus there is currently no risk of logging
content that would result in any corruption after a log replay if the size
of the data encoded in an inline extent is greater than the inode's i_size
(which is not currently possibe either with or without compression),
therefore just remove the assertion.
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
index 65a986054f89e..3558697e4c042 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
@@ -4727,15 +4727,8 @@ static int btrfs_log_trailing_hole(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_file_extent_item);
if (btrfs_file_extent_type(leaf, extent) ==
- BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE) {
- len = btrfs_file_extent_ram_bytes(leaf, extent);
- ASSERT(len == i_size ||
- (len == fs_info->sectorsize &&
- btrfs_file_extent_compression(leaf, extent) !=
- BTRFS_COMPRESS_NONE) ||
- (len < i_size && i_size < fs_info->sectorsize));
+ BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE)
return 0;
- }
len = btrfs_file_extent_num_bytes(leaf, extent);
/* Last extent goes beyond i_size, no need to log a hole. */
--
2.20.1