Re: [PATCH RT 20/25] kmemleak: Cosmetic changes

[Tom Zanussi]

On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 10:12 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-02-21 15:24:48 [-0600], zanussi@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > v4.14.170-rt75-rc1 stable review patch.
> > If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> This makes no sense to apply it. I updated my patch in the RT queue
> to
> what has been sent (and later merged) upstream. Then I was forced to
> sync the non-rebase branch with the rebase branch. This is the
> result.
> 
> What should be applied instead is
> 	fb2c57edcb943 ("kmemleak: Change the lock of kmemleak_object to
> raw_spinlock_t")
> 

I did apply that patch (as patch 14/25 of this series).  This patch
seemed like it was adding some comment bits mised for that one, which
is all it does.

Thanks,

Tom

> from the v4.19-RT branch.
> 
> Sebastian