Re: [patch 01/15] x86/irq: Convey vector as argument and not in ptregs

From: Brian Gerst
Date: Wed Feb 26 2020 - 16:54:46 EST


On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 3:13 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 6:26 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Device interrupts which go through do_IRQ() or the spurious interrupt
> >> handler have their separate entry code on 64 bit for no good reason.
> >>
> >> Both 32 and 64 bit transport the vector number through ORIG_[RE]AX in
> >> pt_regs. Further the vector number is forced to fit into an u8 and is
> >> complemented and offset by 0x80 for historical reasons.
> >
> > The reason for the 0x80 offset is so that the push instruction only
> > takes two bytes. This allows each entry stub to be packed into a
> > fixed 8 bytes. idt_setup_apic_and_irq_gates() assumes this 8-byte
> > fixed length for the stubs, so now every odd vector after 0x80 is
> > broken.
> >
> > 508: 6a 7f pushq $0x7f
> > 50a: e9 f1 08 00 00 jmpq e00 <common_interrupt>
> > 50f: 90 nop
> > 510: 68 80 00 00 00 pushq $0x80
> > 515: e9 e6 08 00 00 jmpq e00 <common_interrupt>
> > 51a: 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
> > 520: 68 81 00 00 00 pushq $0x81
> > 525: e9 d6 08 00 00 jmpq e00 <common_interrupt>
> > 52a: 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
> >
> > The 0x81 vector should start at 0x518, not 0x520.
>
> Bah, I somehow missed that big fat comment explaining it. :)
>
> Thanks for catching it. So my testing just has been lucky to not hit one
> of those.
>
> Now the question is whether we care about the packed stubs or just make
> them larger by using alignment to get rid of this silly +0x80 and
> ~vector fixup later on. The straight forward thing clearly has its charm
> and I doubt it matters in measurable ways.

I think we can get rid of the inversion. That was done so orig_ax had
a negative number (signifying it's not a syscall), but if you replace
it with -1 that isn't necessary. A simple -0x80 offset should be
sufficient.

I think it's a worthy optimization to keep. There are 240 of these
stubs, so increasing the allocation to 16 bytes would add 1920 bytes
to the kernel text.

--
Brian Gerst