Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] dt-bindings: spi: allow expressing DTR capability
From: Mark Brown
Date: Thu Feb 27 2020 - 11:44:29 EST
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 05:40:31PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 5:28 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > It's what we do for other properties, and if this is anything like the
> > other things adding extra wiring you can't assume that the ability to
> > use the feature for TX implies RX.
> Double Transfer Rate uses the same wire.
But is it still on either the TX or RX signals?
> But as you sample at both the rising and the falling edges of the clock, this
> makes the cpha setting meaningless for such transfers, I think ;-)
Might affect what the first bit is possibly?
> However, as the future may bring us QDR, perhaps this should not be a
> boolean flag, but an integer value?
> Cfr. spi-tx-bus-width vs. the original spi-tx-dual/spi-tx-quad proposal.
> What would be a good name (as we only need one)? spi-data-phases?
Sounds reasonable, apart from the increasingly vague connection with
something that's recognizably SPI :P
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature