Re: [PATCH 00/61] KVM: x86: Introduce KVM cpu caps

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 28/02/20 02:37, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> Would it be better or worse if we eliminate set_supported_cpuid() hook
>>> completely by doing an ugly hack like (completely untested):
>> Yes, it makes sense.
> Works for me, I'll tack it on.  I think my past self kept it because I was
> planning on using vmx_set_supported_cpuid() for SGX, which adds multiple
> sub-leafs, but I'm pretty sure I can squeeze them into kvm_cpu_caps with
> a few extra shenanigans.
> 

We can add it back for full CPUID leaves; it may even make sense to move
PT processing there (but not in this series).

Paolo