Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: m_can: Add Documentation for transceiver regulator

[Faiz Abbas]

Hi Marc,

On 02/03/20 1:46 pm, Faiz Abbas wrote:
> Marc,
> 
> On 26/02/20 2:40 pm, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> On 21/02/20 2:01 pm, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>> On 2/21/20 9:31 AM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>>>> Hi Rob,
>>>>
>>>> On 20/02/20 2:05 am, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 07:58:34PM +0530, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>>>>>> Some CAN transceivers have a standby line that needs to be asserted
>>>>>> before they can be used. Model this GPIO lines as an optional
>>>>>> fixed-regulator node. Document bindings for the same.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt | 3 +++
>>>>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> This has moved to DT schema in my tree, so please adjust it and resend.
>>>>
>>>> Ok.
>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt
>>>>>> index ed614383af9c..f17e2a5207dc 100644
>>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt
>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt
>>>>>> @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ Optional Subnode:
>>>>>>  			  that can be used for CAN/CAN-FD modes. See
>>>>>>  			  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/can-transceiver.txt
>>>>>>  			  for details.
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +- xceiver-supply: Regulator that powers the CAN transceiver.
>>>>>
>>>>> The supply for a transceiver should go in the transceiver node.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Marc, while I have you here, do you agree with this?
>>>
>>> I'll look into the details later today.
>>>
>>
>> Sure. Be sure to take another look at my attempt to use the transceiver
>> with a phy driver some time ago.
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1006238/
>>
> 
> Do you have any comments?
> 

Gentle ping.

Thanks,
Faiz