Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] remoteproc: Use u64 type for boot_addr

From: Mathieu Poirier
Date: Mon Mar 09 2020 - 15:52:54 EST


On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 10:38:57AM +0100, Clement Leger wrote:
> elf64 entry is defined as a u64. Since boot_addr is used to store the
> elf entry point, change boot_addr type to u64 to support both elf32
> and elf64. In the same time, fix users that were using this variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clement Leger <cleger@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c | 2 +-
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 2 +-
> drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 ++--
> 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
> index 606aae166eba..c2a9783cfb9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_elf_loader.c
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_elf_sanity_check);
> * Note that the boot address is not a configurable property of all remote
> * processors. Some will always boot at a specific hard-coded address.
> */
> -u32 rproc_elf_get_boot_addr(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> +u64 rproc_elf_get_boot_addr(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> {
> struct elf32_hdr *ehdr = (struct elf32_hdr *)fw->data;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> index 58580210575c..0deae5f237b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr);
> int rproc_trigger_recovery(struct rproc *rproc);
>
> int rproc_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> -u32 rproc_elf_get_boot_addr(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> +u64 rproc_elf_get_boot_addr(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> int rproc_elf_load_segments(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> int rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> struct resource_table *rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,

The return type of function rproc_get_boot_addr() should also be changed from
u32 to u64. Or perhaps this is intentional to make sure rproc->bootaddr never
occupies more than 32bit?

> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c
> index ee13d23b43a9..a3268d95a50e 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c
> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static int st_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> }
> }
>
> - dev_info(&rproc->dev, "Started from 0x%x\n", rproc->bootaddr);
> + dev_info(&rproc->dev, "Started from 0x%llx\n", rproc->bootaddr);
>
> return 0;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index bee559330204..1683d6c386a6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ struct rproc_ops {
> struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> int (*load)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> int (*sanity_check)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> - u32 (*get_boot_addr)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> + u64 (*get_boot_addr)(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw);
> };
>
> /**
> @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ struct rproc {
> int num_traces;
> struct list_head carveouts;
> struct list_head mappings;
> - u32 bootaddr;
> + u64 bootaddr;
> struct list_head rvdevs;
> struct list_head subdevs;
> struct idr notifyids;
> --
> 2.15.0.276.g89ea799
>