[PATCH 16/19] perf block-info: Fix wrong block address comparison in block_info__cmp()
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Tue Mar 10 2020 - 07:17:10 EST
From: Jin Yao <yao.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Commit 6041441870ab ("perf block: Cleanup and refactor block info
functions") introduces block_info__cmp(), which compares two blocks.
But the issues are:
1. It should return the strcmp cmp value only if it's not 0.
2. When symbol names are matched, we need to compare the addresses
of blocks further. But it wrongly uses the symbol addresses for
comparison.
3. If the syms are both NULL, we can't consider these two blocks are
matched.
This patch fixes above 3 issues.
Fixes: 6041441870ab ("perf block: Cleanup and refactor block info functions")
Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200202141655.32053-2-yao.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/util/block-info.c | 21 ++++++---------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/block-info.c b/tools/perf/util/block-info.c
index fbbb6d640dad..5b4214656e29 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/block-info.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/block-info.c
@@ -74,30 +74,21 @@ int64_t block_info__cmp(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt __maybe_unused,
if (!bi_l->sym || !bi_r->sym) {
if (!bi_l->sym && !bi_r->sym)
- return 0;
+ return -1;
else if (!bi_l->sym)
return -1;
else
return 1;
}
- if (bi_l->sym == bi_r->sym) {
- if (bi_l->start == bi_r->start) {
- if (bi_l->end == bi_r->end)
- return 0;
- else
- return (int64_t)(bi_r->end - bi_l->end);
- } else
- return (int64_t)(bi_r->start - bi_l->start);
- } else {
- cmp = strcmp(bi_l->sym->name, bi_r->sym->name);
+ cmp = strcmp(bi_l->sym->name, bi_r->sym->name);
+ if (cmp)
return cmp;
- }
- if (bi_l->sym->start != bi_r->sym->start)
- return (int64_t)(bi_r->sym->start - bi_l->sym->start);
+ if (bi_l->start != bi_r->start)
+ return (int64_t)(bi_r->start - bi_l->start);
- return (int64_t)(bi_r->sym->end - bi_l->sym->end);
+ return (int64_t)(bi_r->end - bi_l->end);
}
static void init_block_info(struct block_info *bi, struct symbol *sym,
--
2.21.1