Re: [PATCH net-next 10/15] ethtool: provide ring sizes with RINGS_GET request
From: Jakub Kicinski
Date: Wed Mar 11 2020 - 19:16:29 EST
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:40:53 +0100 (CET) Michal Kubecek wrote:
> +static int rings_prepare_data(const struct ethnl_req_info *req_base,
> + struct ethnl_reply_data *reply_base,
> + struct genl_info *info)
> +{
> + struct rings_reply_data *data = RINGS_REPDATA(reply_base);
> + struct net_device *dev = reply_base->dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!dev->ethtool_ops->get_ringparam)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + ret = ethnl_ops_begin(dev);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + dev->ethtool_ops->get_ringparam(dev, &data->ringparam);
> + ret = 0;
> + ethnl_ops_complete(dev);
> +
> + return ret;
nit: just return 0 and drop ret = 0 above, there is no goto here
> +}
> +
> +static int rings_reply_size(const struct ethnl_req_info *req_base,
> + const struct ethnl_reply_data *reply_base)
> +{
> + return 8 * nla_total_size(sizeof(u32))
nit: 8 is a little bit of a magic constant
> + + 0;
nit: personally not a huge fan
> +}
> +
> +static int rings_fill_reply(struct sk_buff *skb,
> + const struct ethnl_req_info *req_base,
> + const struct ethnl_reply_data *reply_base)
> +{
> + const struct rings_reply_data *data = RINGS_REPDATA(reply_base);
> + const struct ethtool_ringparam *ringparam = &data->ringparam;
> +
> + if (nla_put_u32(skb, ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_RX_MAX,
> + ringparam->rx_max_pending) ||
> + nla_put_u32(skb, ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_RX_MINI_MAX,
> + ringparam->rx_mini_max_pending) ||
> + nla_put_u32(skb, ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_RX_JUMBO_MAX,
> + ringparam->rx_jumbo_max_pending) ||
> + nla_put_u32(skb, ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TX_MAX,
> + ringparam->tx_max_pending) ||
> + nla_put_u32(skb, ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_RX,
> + ringparam->rx_pending) ||
> + nla_put_u32(skb, ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_RX_MINI,
> + ringparam->rx_mini_pending) ||
> + nla_put_u32(skb, ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_RX_JUMBO,
> + ringparam->rx_jumbo_pending) ||
> + nla_put_u32(skb, ETHTOOL_A_RINGS_TX,
> + ringparam->tx_pending))
> + return -EMSGSIZE;
nit: I wonder if it's necessary to report the zero values..
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>