Re: [PATCH] serial: sh-sci: Support custom speed setting

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Torii-san,

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 6:10 AM torii.ken1@xxxxxxxxxxx
<torii.ken1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 05:57:35 +0900,
> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 01:32:50PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:20 PM Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > From: Torii Kenichi <torii.ken1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > This patch is necessary to use BT module and XM module with DENSO TEN
> > > > development board.
> > > >
> > > > This patch supports ASYNC_SPD_CUST flag by ioctl(TIOCSSERIAL), enables
> > > > custom speed setting with setserial(1).
> > > >
> > > > The custom speed is calculated from uartclk and custom_divisor.
> > > > If custom_divisor is zero, custom speed setting is invalid.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Torii Kenichi <torii.ken1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > [erosca: rebase against v5.5]
> > > > Signed-off-by: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Thanks for your patch!
> > >
> > > While this seems to work fine[*], I have a few comments/questions:
> > >   1. This feature seems to be deprecated:
> > >
> > >          sh-sci e6e68000.serial: setserial sets custom speed on
> > > ttySC1. This is deprecated.
> > >
> > >   2. As the wanted speed is specified as a divider, the resulting speed
> > >      may be off, cfr. the example for 57600 below.
> > >      Note that the SCIF device has multiple clock inputs, and can do
> > >      57600 perfectly if the right crystal has been fitted.
> > >
> > >  3. What to do with "[PATCH/RFC] serial: sh-sci: Update uartclk based
> > >      on selected clock" (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11103703/)?
> > >      Combined with this, things become pretty complicated and
> > >      unpredictable, as uartclk now always reflect the frequency of the
> > >      last used base clock, which was the optimal one for the previously
> > >      used speed....
> > >
> > > I think it would be easier if we just had an API to specify a raw speed.
> > > Perhaps that already exists?
> >
> > Yes, see:
> >       http://www.panix.com/~grante/arbitrary-baud.c
>
> I saw the code above, I thought I wouldn't write such code normally.
>
> >#include <linux/termios.h>
> >
> >int ioctl(int d, int request, ...);
>
> Do application programmers have to accept this bad code?

I guess you mean the forward declaration of ioctrl()?
No, they should include <sys/ioctl.h> instead.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds