Re: [PATCH] Fix missing 'bit' in comment

From: Andreas Dilger
Date: Thu Mar 12 2020 - 17:27:54 EST


On Mar 12, 2020, at 4:40 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 3/12/20 8:40 AM, Chucheng Luo wrote:
>> The missing word may make it hard for other developers to
>> understand it.
>> Signed-off-by: Chucheng Luo <luochucheng@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for catching this:
>
> Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>

Not to nit-pick, but these should properly be written as "32-bit" and "64-bit".
That can be easily fixed in the patch before upstream submission.

Cheers, Andreas

> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>> ---
>> fs/vboxsf/dir.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> diff --git a/fs/vboxsf/dir.c b/fs/vboxsf/dir.c
>> index dd147b490982..be4f72625d36 100644
>> --- a/fs/vboxsf/dir.c
>> +++ b/fs/vboxsf/dir.c
>> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static bool vboxsf_dir_emit(struct file *dir, struct dir_context *ctx)
>> d_type = vboxsf_get_d_type(info->info.attr.mode);
>> /*
>> - * On 32 bit systems pos is 64 signed, while ino is 32 bit
>> + * On 32 bit systems pos is 64 bit signed, while ino is 32 bit
>> * unsigned so fake_ino may overflow, check for this.
>> */
>> if ((ino_t)(ctx->pos + 1) != (u64)(ctx->pos + 1)) {
>


Cheers, Andreas





Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP