Re: [PATCH 01/23] mtd: spi-nor: Stop prefixing generic functions with a manufacturer name

[Boris Brezillon]

On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 11:34:55 +0530
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx> wrote:

> On 02/03/20 11:37 pm, Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Replace the manufacturer prefix by something describing more precisely
> > what those functions do.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > [tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: prepend spi_nor_ to all modified methods.]
> > Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> >  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> > index caf0c109cca0..b15e262765e1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> > @@ -568,14 +568,15 @@ static int spi_nor_read_cr(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 *cr)
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > - * macronix_set_4byte() - Set 4-byte address mode for Macronix flashes.
> > + * spi_nor_en4_ex4_set_4byte() - Enter/Exit 4-byte mode for Macronix like
> > + * flashes.
> >   * @nor:	pointer to 'struct spi_nor'.
> >   * @enable:	true to enter the 4-byte address mode, false to exit the 4-byte
> >   *		address mode.
> >   *
> >   * Return: 0 on success, -errno otherwise.
> >   */
> > -static int macronix_set_4byte(struct spi_nor *nor, bool enable)
> > +static int spi_nor_en4_ex4_set_4byte(struct spi_nor *nor, bool enable)  
> 
> 
> Sounds a bit weird, how about simplifying this to:
> 
> 	spi_nor_set_4byte_addr_mode()
> 
> Or if you want to be specific:
> 
> 	spi_nor_en_ex_4byte_addr_mode()

You're right. Maybe we can simplify things by having a single function
that does optional steps based on new flags

SPI_NOR_EN_EX_4B_NEEDS_WEN
SPI_NOR_CLEAR_EAR_ON_4B_EXIT

This should probably be done in a separate patch though, so ack on the
spi_nor_en_ex_4byte_addr_mode() rename, assuming we also change the
bool argument name to enter.

> 
> >  {
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > @@ -604,14 +605,15 @@ static int macronix_set_4byte(struct spi_nor *nor, bool enable)
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > - * st_micron_set_4byte() - Set 4-byte address mode for ST and Micron flashes.
> > + * spi_nor_en4_ex4_wen_set_4byte() - Set 4-byte address mode for ST and Micron
> > + * flashes.
> >   * @nor:	pointer to 'struct spi_nor'.
> >   * @enable:	true to enter the 4-byte address mode, false to exit the 4-byte
> >   *		address mode.
> >   *
> >   * Return: 0 on success, -errno otherwise.
> >   */
> > -static int st_micron_set_4byte(struct spi_nor *nor, bool enable)
> > +static int spi_nor_en4_ex4_wen_set_4byte(struct spi_nor *nor, bool enable)  
> 
> 
> Unrelated to this patch itself, but can we just have one set_4byte
> variant that uses WREN and drop the other one?

Hm, not sure that's a good idea to insert WEN instructions for
everyone, sounds like a recipe for regressions.

> I expect sending WREN should be harmless even for cmds that don't expect
> one.

In theory yes, but you know flash chips are capricious, so let's not
take the risk of breaking things :-).

> 
> Rest looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx>
>