Re: [PATCH v4] Documentation: kunit: Make the KUnit documentation less UML-specific

[shuah]

On 3/2/20 9:50 AM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 2/28/20 1:18 PM, David Gow wrote:
> > Remove some of the outmoded "Why KUnit" rationale, and move some
> > UML-specific information to the kunit_tool page. Also update the Getting
> > Started guide to mention running tests without the kunit_tool wrapper.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Sorry: I missed a couple of issues in the last version. They're fixed
> > here, and I think this should be ready to go.
> >
> > Changelog:
> >
> > v4:
> > - Fix typo: s/offsers/offers
> > - Talk about KUnit tests running on most "architectures" instead of
> >    "kernel configurations.
> > v3:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200214235723.254228-1-davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
> > - Added a note that KUnit can be used with UML, both with and without
> >    kunit_tool to replace the section moved to kunit_tool.
> > v2:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/f99a3d4d-ad65-5fd1-3407-db33f378b1fa@xxxxxxxxx/T/
> > - Reinstated the "Why Kunit?" section, minus the comparison with other
> >    testing frameworks (covered in the FAQ), and the description of UML.
> > - Moved the description of UML into to kunit_tool page.
> > - Tidied up the wording around how KUnit is built and run to make it
> >    work
> >    without the UML description.
> > v1:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/9c703dea-a9e1-94e2-c12d-3cb0a09e75ac@xxxxxxxxx/T/
> > - Initial patch
>
> Thanks for all the changes.  The documents are now much more understandable
> and useful.

Is this ready to go? If it goes through doc tree:

Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Otherwise, I can pic it up.

thanks,
-- Shuah