Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/fsl-85xx: fix compile error

From: Christophe Leroy
Date: Fri Mar 13 2020 - 15:24:31 EST




Le 13/03/2020 Ã 19:17, çæè a ÃcritÂ:
åääïChristophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx>
åéææï2020-03-14 01:45:11
æääïWANG Wenhu <wenhu.wang@xxxxxxxx>,Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>,Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx>,Kate Stewart <kstewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,Allison Randal <allison@xxxxxxxxxxx>,Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
æéäïkernel@xxxxxxxx,trivial@xxxxxxxxxx
äéïRe: [PATCH v2] powerpc/fsl-85xx: fix compile error>

Le 13/03/2020 Ã 18:19, WANG Wenhu a ÃcritÂ:
Include "linux/of_address.h" to fix the compile error for
mpc85xx_l2ctlr_of_probe() when compiling fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c.

CC arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.o
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c: In function âmpc85xx_l2ctlr_of_probeâ:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c:90:11: error: implicit declaration of function âof_iomapâ; did you mean âpci_iomapâ? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
l2ctlr = of_iomap(dev->dev.of_node, 0);
^~~~~~~~
pci_iomap
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c:90:9: error: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
l2ctlr = of_iomap(dev->dev.of_node, 0);
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
scripts/Makefile.build:267: recipe for target 'arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.o' failed
make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.o] Error 1

Fixes: commit 6db92cc9d07d ("powerpc/85xx: add cache-sram support")

Shouldn't you Cc stable as well ?
Pretty sure if it makes a difference(that I did not recognize).
Does the inconsistency of Cc lead to a failure on classification
or something else which may confuse you?

See https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v5.1.9#n299


Signed-off-by: WANG Wenhu <wenhu.wang@xxxxxxxx>
---

What's the difference between v1 and v2 ?
The label field modification: "Fixed" -> "Fixes", which now is
identified successfully. Really sorry for the fault on v1.

Ok. Usually people tell here (just below the ---) what is the difference between the different versions. It helps people understand what the changes are.

Christophe