Re: [PATCHv3 5/5] clk: samsung: exynos542x: Move FSYS subsystem clocks to its sub-CMU

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 07:38:30PM +0530, Anand Moon wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 18:24, Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 17:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 04:04:57PM +0530, Anand Moon wrote:
> > > > Hi Krzysztof,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your review comments.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 at 20:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 07:48:54PM +0000, Anand Moon wrote:
> > > > > > FSYS power domain support usbdrd3, pdma and usb2 power gaiting,
> > > > > > hence move FSYS clk setting to sub-CMU block to support power domain
> > > > > > on/off sequences for device nodes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > New patch in the series
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
> > > > > > index c9e5a1fb6653..6c4c47dfcdce 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
> > > > > > @@ -859,12 +859,6 @@ static const struct samsung_div_clock exynos5x_div_clks[] __initconst = {
> > > > > >       DIV(0, "dout_maudio0", "mout_maudio0", DIV_MAU, 20, 4),
> > > > > >       DIV(0, "dout_maupcm0", "dout_maudio0", DIV_MAU, 24, 8),
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -     /* USB3.0 */
> > > > > > -     DIV(0, "dout_usbphy301", "mout_usbd301", DIV_FSYS0, 12, 4),
> > > > > > -     DIV(0, "dout_usbphy300", "mout_usbd300", DIV_FSYS0, 16, 4),
> > > > > > -     DIV(0, "dout_usbd301", "mout_usbd301", DIV_FSYS0, 20, 4),
> > > > > > -     DIV(0, "dout_usbd300", "mout_usbd300", DIV_FSYS0, 24, 4),
> > > > >
> > > > > According to clock diagram these are still in CMU TOP, not FSYS.
> > > > >
> > > > > > -
> > > > > >       /* MMC */
> > > > > >       DIV(0, "dout_mmc0", "mout_mmc0", DIV_FSYS1, 0, 10),
> > > > > >       DIV(0, "dout_mmc1", "mout_mmc1", DIV_FSYS1, 10, 10),
> > > > > > @@ -1031,8 +1025,6 @@ static const struct samsung_gate_clock exynos5x_gate_clks[] __initconst = {
> > > > > />
> > > > > >       /* FSYS Block */
> > > > > >       GATE(CLK_TSI, "tsi", "aclk200_fsys", GATE_BUS_FSYS0, 0, 0, 0),
> > > > > > -     GATE(CLK_PDMA0, "pdma0", "aclk200_fsys", GATE_BUS_FSYS0, 1, 0, 0),
> > > > > > -     GATE(CLK_PDMA1, "pdma1", "aclk200_fsys", GATE_BUS_FSYS0, 2, 0, 0),
> > > > > >       GATE(CLK_UFS, "ufs", "aclk200_fsys2", GATE_BUS_FSYS0, 3, 0, 0),
> > > > > >       GATE(CLK_RTIC, "rtic", "aclk200_fsys", GATE_IP_FSYS, 9, 0, 0),
> > > > > >       GATE(CLK_MMC0, "mmc0", "aclk200_fsys2", GATE_IP_FSYS, 12, 0, 0),
> > > > > > @@ -1040,9 +1032,6 @@ static const struct samsung_gate_clock exynos5x_gate_clks[] __initconst = {
> > > > > >       GATE(CLK_MMC2, "mmc2", "aclk200_fsys2", GATE_IP_FSYS, 14, 0, 0),
> > > > > >       GATE(CLK_SROMC, "sromc", "aclk200_fsys2",
> > > > > >                       GATE_IP_FSYS, 17, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, 0),
> > > > > > -     GATE(CLK_USBH20, "usbh20", "aclk200_fsys", GATE_IP_FSYS, 18, 0, 0),
> > > > > > -     GATE(CLK_USBD300, "usbd300", "aclk200_fsys", GATE_IP_FSYS, 19, 0, 0),
> > > > > > -     GATE(CLK_USBD301, "usbd301", "aclk200_fsys", GATE_IP_FSYS, 20, 0, 0),
> > > > > >       GATE(CLK_SCLK_UNIPRO, "sclk_unipro", "dout_unipro",
> > > > > >                       SRC_MASK_FSYS, 24, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -1258,6 +1247,28 @@ static struct exynos5_subcmu_reg_dump exynos5x_gsc_suspend_regs[] = {
> > > > > >       { DIV2_RATIO0, 0, 0x30 },       /* DIV dout_gscl_blk_300 */
> > > > > >  };
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +/* USB3.0 */
> > > > > > +static const struct samsung_div_clock exynos5x_fsys_div_clks[] __initconst = {
> > > > > > +     DIV(0, "dout_usbphy301", "mout_usbd301", DIV_FSYS0, 12, 4),
> > > > > > +     DIV(0, "dout_usbphy300", "mout_usbd300", DIV_FSYS0, 16, 4),
> > > > > > +     DIV(0, "dout_usbd301", "mout_usbd301", DIV_FSYS0, 20, 4),
> > > > > > +     DIV(0, "dout_usbd300", "mout_usbd300", DIV_FSYS0, 24, 4),
> > > > > > +};
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static const struct samsung_gate_clock exynos5x_fsys_gate_clks[] __initconst = {
> > > > > > +     GATE(CLK_PDMA0, "pdma0", "aclk200_fsys", GATE_BUS_FSYS0, 1, 0, 0),
> > > > > > +     GATE(CLK_PDMA1, "pdma1", "aclk200_fsys", GATE_BUS_FSYS0, 2, 0, 0),
> > > > > > +     GATE(CLK_USBH20, "usbh20", "aclk200_fsys", GATE_IP_FSYS, 18, 0, 0),
> > > > > > +     GATE(CLK_USBD300, "usbd300", "aclk200_fsys", GATE_IP_FSYS, 19, 0, 0),
> > > > > > +     GATE(CLK_USBD301, "usbd301", "aclk200_fsys", GATE_IP_FSYS, 20, 0, 0),
> > > > > > +};
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static struct exynos5_subcmu_reg_dump exynos5x_fsys_suspend_regs[] = {
> > > > > > +     { GATE_IP_FSYS, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff }, /* FSYS gates */
> > > > >
> > > > > This looks wrong. GATE_IP_FSYS has fields also for FSYS2 clocks which
> > > > > you are not suspending. They do not belong to this CMU.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ok. I change the from GATE_IP_FSYS to GATE_BUS_FSYS0 in the above
> > > > exynos5x_fsys_gate_clks to make this consistent to used GATE_BUS_FSYS0 for CMU,
> > > > with this change it works as per previously.
> > >
> > > Wait, you should set here proper registers with proper mask.
> >
> > Yes I will set the proper mask for each as per the Exynos 5422 User Manual.
> >
> > Here is what I feel
> > CLK_GATE_BUS_FSYS0 controls the PHY clock
> > CLK_GATE_IP_FSYS controls the IP clock.
> >
> 
> Sorry I cannot register both CLK_GATE_BUS_FSYS0 and CLK_GATE_IP_FSYS
> to aclk200_fsys, so I got some error like below.
> 
> [    0.922693] samsung_clk_register_gate: failed to register clock usbh20
> [    0.922857] samsung_clk_register_gate: failed to register clock usbd300
> [    0.923000] samsung_clk_register_gate: failed to register clock usbd301
> 
> > So both these field should be part of this FSYS CMU.

I am not sure if I understand your problem. I mentioned that you need
to put proper registers with proper masks into the
exynos5_subcmu_reg_dump. I don't know what have you changed to produce
such error logs.

Best regards,
Krzysztof