On 13.03.20 12:03, Chi-Hsien Lin wrote:
On 12/16/2019 7:43, Heiko StÃbner wrote:Chi-hsien,
Hi Soeren,
Am Sonntag, 15. Dezember 2019, 22:24:10 CET schrieb Soeren Moch:
On 12.12.19 11:59, Soeren Moch wrote:
On 12.12.19 10:42, Kalle Valo wrote:
Soeren Moch <smoch@xxxxxx> writes:Yes, this also is my understanding. I'm glad if you are fine with
Add support for the BCM4359 chipset with SDIO interface and RSDBJust to make sure we are on the same page, I will apply patches
support
to the brcmfmac wireless network driver in patches 1-7.
Enhance devicetree of the RockPro64 arm64/rockchip board to use an
AP6359SA based wifi/bt combo module with this chipset in patches
8-9.
Chung-Hsien Hsu (1):
ÂÂ brcmfmac: set F2 blocksize and watermark for 4359
Soeren Moch (5):
ÂÂ brcmfmac: fix rambase for 4359/9
ÂÂ brcmfmac: make errors when setting roaming parameters non-fatal
ÂÂ brcmfmac: add support for BCM4359 SDIO chipset
ÂÂ arm64: dts: rockchip: RockPro64: enable wifi module at sdio0
ÂÂ arm64: dts: rockchip: RockPro64: hook up bluetooth at uart0
Wright Feng (3):
ÂÂ brcmfmac: reset two D11 cores if chip has two D11 cores
ÂÂ brcmfmac: add RSDB condition when setting interface combinations
ÂÂ brcmfmac: not set mbss in vif if firmware does not support MBSS
 .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dts | 50 +++++++++++---
 .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 8 ++-
 .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 68
+++++++++++++++----
 .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c | 54 ++++++++++++++-
 .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.h | 1 +
 .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c | 2 +-
 .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 17 +++++
 include/linux/mmc/sdio_ids.h | 2 +
 8 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
1-7 to
wireless-drivers-next and patches 8-9 go to some other tree? And
there
are no dependencies between the brcmfmac patches and dts patches?
patches 1-7.
Heiko will pick up patches 8-9 later for linux-rockchip independently.
And if we need another round of review for patches 8-9, I think we
don't
need to bother linux-wireless with this.
Heiko,
is this OK for you when patches 1-7 are merged now in wireless-drivers,
and then I send a v3 for patches 8-9 only for you to merge in
linux-rockchip later? Or do you prefer a full v3 for the whole series
with only this pending clock name update in patch 9?
Nope, merging 1-7 from this v2 and then getting a v3 with only the dts
stuff is perfectly fine :-)
Soeren,
I suppose patch 1-7 from this serious are all good for merging. Is
that right? If so, could you please create a rebased V3?
Thanks for asking, but these patches are already merged in
torvalds/v5.6-rc1 as commits
1b8d2e0a9e42..2635853ce4ab
So everything already fine with this.
Thanks,
Soeren
Regards,
Chi-hsien Lin
Heiko
.