Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] power: supply: add CellWise cw2015 fuel gauge driver

[Tobias Schramm]

Hi Andy,

thanks for your feedback. Please find my comments inline.

> 
>> +				dev_err(cw_bat->dev,
>> +					 "Failed to upload battery info\n");
> 
> Indentation of the second line.
> 
I've seen quite a few different indentation styles used in kernel
source. Personally I'd indent like this:

		dev_warn(cw_bat->dev,
			 "some long error message");

However coding-style.rst specifies that spaces are never to be used for
indentation. May I assume they are ok for alignment though?


> And I'm thinking that we may refactor this function. So,
> 
> 	length = ..._count_u8(...);
> 	if (length < 0) {
> 		dev_warn(...);
> 	} else if (length != ...) {
> 		dev_err(...);
> 		...
> 	} else {
> 		...
> 	}
> 
> 
> 
>> +		if (length != CW2015_SIZE_BATINFO) {
>> +			dev_err(cw_bat->dev, "battery-profile must be %d bytes",
>> +				CW2015_SIZE_BATINFO);
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		cw_bat->bat_profile = devm_kzalloc(dev, length, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +		if (!cw_bat->bat_profile) {
>> +			dev_err(cw_bat->dev,
>> +				"Failed to allocate memory for battery config info");
>> +			return -ENOMEM;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		ret = device_property_read_u8_array(dev,
>> +						"cellwise,battery-profile",
>> +						cw_bat->bat_profile,
>> +						length);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>> +	} else {
>> +		dev_warn(cw_bat->dev,
>> +			"No battery-profile found, rolling with current flash contents");
>> +	}
>> +
> 
> ...and here...
> 
>> +	cw_bat->poll_interval_ms = CW2015_DEFAULT_POLL_INTERVAL_MS;
>> +	ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "cellwise,monitor-interval-ms", &value);
>> +	if (ret >= 0) {
>> +		dev_dbg(cw_bat->dev, "Overriding default monitor-interval with %u ms",
>> +			value);
>> +		cw_bat->poll_interval_ms = value;
>> +	}
> 
> 	ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "cellwise,monitor-interval-ms", &cw_bat->poll_interval_ms);
> 	if (ret) {
> 		dev_dbg(cw_bat->dev, "Use default\n");
> 		cw_bat->poll_interval_ms = CW2015_DEFAULT_POLL_INTERVAL_MS;
> 	}
> 
> What do you think?
> 
Looks good to me. I'll use it just like that.

> 
>> +	int ret;
>> +	struct cw_battery *cw_bat;
> 
>> +	struct power_supply_config psy_cfg = { };
> 
> Don't you need 0 here?
> 
Yeah, that would be better. Think empty initializers are a GNU extension.


Best Regards,

Tobias