Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: correct meaningless kvm_apicv_activated() check

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 16/03/20 16:59, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>>
>> 	if (!!old == !!new)
>> 		return;
>>
>> to make it clear we're converting them to 1/0 :-)
>
> All I can think of now is the Onion article regarding razor blades...
> 
> 	if (!!!!old == !!!!new)
> 		return;
> 

That would be !!!!!, but seriously I'll go with two.

(Thanks for giving me a chuckle, it's sorely needed these days).

Paolo