Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb-gadget tree
From: John Stultz
Date: Mon Mar 16 2020 - 13:42:18 EST
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 8:37 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> After merging the usb-gadget tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/usb/dwc3/drd.c: In function 'dwc3_setup_role_switch':
> drivers/usb/dwc3/drd.c:551:23: error: assignment to 'usb_role_switch_set_t' {aka 'int (*)(struct usb_role_switch *, enum usb_role)'} from incompatible pointer type 'int (*)(struct device *, enum usb_role)' [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> 551 | dwc3_role_switch.set = dwc3_usb_role_switch_set;
> | ^
> drivers/usb/dwc3/drd.c:552:23: error: assignment to 'usb_role_switch_get_t' {aka 'enum usb_role (*)(struct usb_role_switch *)'} from incompatible pointer type 'enum usb_role (*)(struct device *)' [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> 552 | dwc3_role_switch.get = dwc3_usb_role_switch_get;
> | ^
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 8a0a13799744 ("usb: dwc3: Registering a role switch in the DRD code.")
>
> interacting with commit
>
> bce3052f0c16 ("usb: roles: Provide the switch drivers handle to the switch in the API")
>
> from the usb tree.
>
> I have added the following merge fix patch (which may need more work):
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:34:31 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: fix up for role switch API change
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/usb/dwc3/drd.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/drd.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/drd.c
> index db68d48c2267..7db1ffc92bbd 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/drd.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/drd.c
> @@ -478,9 +478,10 @@ static struct extcon_dev *dwc3_get_extcon(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_ROLE_SWITCH)
> #define ROLE_SWITCH 1
> -static int dwc3_usb_role_switch_set(struct device *dev, enum usb_role role)
> +static int dwc3_usb_role_switch_set(struct usb_role_switch *sw,
> + enum usb_role role)
> {
> - struct dwc3 *dwc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct dwc3 *dwc = usb_role_switch_get_drvdata(sw);
> u32 mode;
>
> switch (role) {
> @@ -502,9 +503,9 @@ static int dwc3_usb_role_switch_set(struct device *dev, enum usb_role role)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static enum usb_role dwc3_usb_role_switch_get(struct device *dev)
> +static enum usb_role dwc3_usb_role_switch_get(struct usb_role_switch *sw)
> {
> - struct dwc3 *dwc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct dwc3 *dwc = usb_role_switch_get_drvdata(sw);
> unsigned long flags;
> enum usb_role role;
>
> @@ -550,6 +551,7 @@ static int dwc3_setup_role_switch(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> dwc3_role_switch.fwnode = dev_fwnode(dwc->dev);
> dwc3_role_switch.set = dwc3_usb_role_switch_set;
> dwc3_role_switch.get = dwc3_usb_role_switch_get;
> + dwc3_role_switch.driver_data = dwc;
> dwc->role_sw = usb_role_switch_register(dwc->dev, &dwc3_role_switch);
> if (IS_ERR(dwc->role_sw))
> return PTR_ERR(dwc->role_sw);
Yes, thanks. Bryan pointed out there was a problem with the internal
api change in -next, and I intended to resend the set this week.
Your solution looks like what I have in my tree at first glance, but
I'll double check to be sure.
Thanks so much!
-john